Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32992304›Full record

ArticlePhysiological measurement2020

Patient-adaptable intracranial pressure morphology analysis using a probabilistic model-based approach.

Paria Rashidinejad, Xiao Hu, Stuart Russell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological measurement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paria RashidinejadDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8881-8346
Xiao HuDivision of Health Systems Analytics School of Nursing, Duke University; Department of Electrical Computer Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University; Department of Neurology, Department of Surgery, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9478-5571
Stuart RussellDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-4306
University of California, Berkeley · USDuke University · US

Funding

Learning to Predict Delayed Cerebral Ischemia with Novel Continuous Cerebral Arterial State IndexR01NS113541 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HU, XIAO, VESPA, PAUL M · 2020 to 2025
$3.0M
Integrate Dynamic System Model and Machine Learning for Calibration-Free Noninvasive ICPR01NS106905 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HU, XIAO · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106905NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe present a framework for analyzing the morphology of intracranial pressure (ICP). The analysis of ICP signals is challenging due to the non-linear and non-Gaussian characteristics of the signal dynamics, inevitable corruption by noise and artifacts, and variations in ICP pulse morphology among individuals with different neurological conditions. Existing frameworks make unrealistic assumptions regarding ICP dynamics and are not tuned for individual patients. APPROACH: We propose a dynamic Bayesian network for automated detection of three major ICP pulsatile components. The proposed model captures the non-linear and non-Gaussian dynamics of ICP morphology and further adapts to a patient as the individual's ICP measurements are received. To make the approach more robust, we leverage evidence reversal and present an inference algorithm to obtain the posterior distribution over the locations of pulsatile components. MAIN

resultsWe evaluate our approach on a dataset with over 700 h of recordings from 66 neurological patients, where the pulsatile components were annotated by prior studies. The algorithm obtains accuracies of 96.56%, 92.39%, and 94.04% for the detection of each pulsatile component in the test set, showing significant improvement over existing approaches. SIGNIFICANCE: Continuous ICP monitoring is essential in guiding the treatment of neurological conditions such as traumatic brain injuries. An automated approach for ICP morphology analysis is a step towards enhancing patient care with minimal supervision. Compared to previous methods, our framework offers several advantages. It learns the parameters that model each patient's ICP in an unsupervised manner, resulting in an accurate morphology analysis. The Bayesian model-based framework provides uncertainty estimates and reveals interesting facts about the ICP dynamics. The framework can readily be applied to replace existing morphological analysis methods and support the use of ICP pulse morphological features to aid the monitoring of pathophysiological changes of relevance to the care of patients with acute brain injuries.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID32992304
PMCPMC7951992
OpenAlexW3090925506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.