ArticlePhysiological measurement2020
Patient-adaptable intracranial pressure morphology analysis using a probabilistic model-based approach.
Article in Physiological measurement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Deep Learning-Based Automated Framework for Subpeak Designation on Intracranial Pressure Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe present a framework for analyzing the morphology of intracranial pressure (ICP). The analysis of ICP signals is challenging due to the non-linear and non-Gaussian characteristics of the signal dynamics, inevitable corruption by noise and artifacts, and variations in ICP pulse morphology among individuals with different neurological conditions. Existing frameworks make unrealistic assumptions regarding ICP dynamics and are not tuned for individual patients. APPROACH: We propose a dynamic Bayesian network for automated detection of three major ICP pulsatile components. The proposed model captures the non-linear and non-Gaussian dynamics of ICP morphology and further adapts to a patient as the individual's ICP measurements are received. To make the approach more robust, we leverage evidence reversal and present an inference algorithm to obtain the posterior distribution over the locations of pulsatile components. MAIN
resultsWe evaluate our approach on a dataset with over 700 h of recordings from 66 neurological patients, where the pulsatile components were annotated by prior studies. The algorithm obtains accuracies of 96.56%, 92.39%, and 94.04% for the detection of each pulsatile component in the test set, showing significant improvement over existing approaches. SIGNIFICANCE: Continuous ICP monitoring is essential in guiding the treatment of neurological conditions such as traumatic brain injuries. An automated approach for ICP morphology analysis is a step towards enhancing patient care with minimal supervision. Compared to previous methods, our framework offers several advantages. It learns the parameters that model each patient's ICP in an unsupervised manner, resulting in an accurate morphology analysis. The Bayesian model-based framework provides uncertainty estimates and reveals interesting facts about the ICP dynamics. The framework can readily be applied to replace existing morphological analysis methods and support the use of ICP pulse morphological features to aid the monitoring of pathophysiological changes of relevance to the care of patients with acute brain injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.