ArticleGenomics2021
World competitive contest-based artificial neural network: A new class-specific method for classification of clinical and biological datasets.
Article in Genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A voting-based machine learning approach for classifying biological and clinical datasets.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many data mining methods have been proposed to generate computer-aided diagnostic systems, which may determine diseases in their early stages by categorizing the data into some proper classes. Considering the importance of the existence of a suitable classifier, the present study aims to introduce an efficient approach based on the World Competitive Contests (WCC) algorithm as well as a multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN). Unlike the previously introduced methods, which each has developed a universal model for all different kinds of data classes, our proposed approach generates a single specific model for each individual class of data. The experimental results show that the proposed method (ANNWCC), which can be applied to both the balanced and unbalanced datasets, yields more than 76% (without applying feature selection methods) and 90% (with applying feature selection methods) of the average five-fold cross-validation accuracy on the 13 clinical and biological datasets. The findings also indicate that under different conditions, our proposed method can produce better results in comparison to some state-of-art meta-heuristic algorithms and methods in terms of various statistical and classification measurements. To classify the clinical and biological data, a multi-layer ANN and the WCC algorithm were combined. It was shown that developing a specific model for each individual class of data may yield better results compared with creating a universal model for all of the existing data classes. Besides, some efficient algorithms proved to be essential to generate acceptable biological results, and the methods' performance was found to be enhanced by fuzzifying or normalizing the biological data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.