ArticleChest2021
Operational Recommendations for Scarce Resource Allocation in a Public Health Crisis.
Article in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early diagnostic value of home video-based machine learning in autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Four-organ SOFA score as a potential tool to triage use of continuous kidney replacement therapy in COVID-19 patients with acute kidney injury: a retrospective two-center study.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Simulating crisis triage: a methodological framework for evaluating ventilator allocation under crisis standards of care.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Clinician Perspectives on the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Decision-Making Process.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Optimizing Emergency Response in Hospitals: A Systematic Review of Surge Capacity Planning and Crisis Resource Management.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Covert Triage During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis of Rationing in Intensive Care.Chest · 2025Article
- Policymakers' engagement with ethicists to improve public health in the United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Role of urodynamics in predicting fecal incontinence in spina bifida and spinal cord injury patients.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Observational
- Article
- Winning the Lottery: A Simulation Study Comparing Scarce Resource Allocation Protocols in Crisis Scenarios.Cureus · 2025Article
- Health Professional vs Layperson Values and Preferences on Scarce Resource Allocation.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Investigating ethical tradeoffs in crisis standards of care through simulation of ventilator allocation protocols.PloS one · 2024Article
- Comparison of Six Scoring Systems for Predicting In-hospital Mortality among Patients with SARS-COV2 Presenting to the Emergency Department.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Then and Now; Broadening Indications and Availability.Critical care clinics · 2023Review
- Global Nurse Involvement in ethical decision-making during pandemics: a concept analysis.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2023Article
- Review
- Community preferences for the allocation of scarce healthcare resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature.Public health · 2022Review
- Evaluation of the neonatal sequential organ failure assessment and mortality risk in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Functionality of Scarce Healthcare Resource Triage Teams During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-Institutional Simulation Study.Critical care explorations · 2022Article
- An expanded institutional- and national-level blueprint to address nurse burnout and moral suffering amid the evolving pandemic.Nursing management · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic may require rationing of various medical resources if demand exceeds supply. Theoretical frameworks for resource allocation have provided much needed ethical guidance, but hospitals still need to address objective practicalities and legal vetting to operationalize scarce resource allocation schemata. To develop operational scarce resource allocation processes for public health catastrophes, including the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, five health systems in Maryland formed a consortium-with diverse expertise and representation-representing more than half of all hospitals in the state. Our efforts built on a prior statewide community engagement process that determined the values and moral reference points of citizens and health-care professionals regarding the allocation of ventilators during a public health catastrophe. Through a partnership of health systems, we developed a scarce resource allocation framework informed by citizens' values and by general expert consensus. Allocation schema for mechanical ventilators, ICU resources, blood components, novel therapeutics, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and renal replacement therapies were developed. Creating operational algorithms for each resource posed unique challenges; each resource's varying nature and underlying data on benefit prevented any single algorithm from being universally applicable. The development of scarce resource allocation processes must be iterative, legally vetted, and tested. We offer our processes to assist other regions that may be faced with the challenge of rationing health-care resources during public health catastrophes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.