Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32991705›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2020

Nutritional Considerations and Strategies to Facilitate Injury Recovery and Rehabilitation.

Abbie E Smith-Ryan, Katie R Hirsch, Hannah E Saylor, Lacey M Gould, Malia N M Blue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05823649 (Effect of Early Versus Delayed Postoperative Feeding in Lower Limb Fracture Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05823649 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Early Versus Delayed Postoperative Feeding in Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArmed Police Force Hospital, NepalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled275ConditionsLower Limb FractureArmsEarly feeding/intervention group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Analysis of clinical pharmacists' interventions in a rehabilitation setting.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abbie E Smith-RyanDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Katie R HirschDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Hannah E SaylorDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Lacey M GouldDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Malia N M BlueHuman Movement Science Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional interventions are not commonly a standard of care in rehabilitation interventions. A nutritional approach has the potential to be a low-cost, high-volume strategy that complements the existing standard of care. In this commentary, our aim is to provide an evidence-based, practical guide for athletes with injuries treated surgically or conservatively, along with healing and rehabilitation considerations. Injuries are a normal and expected part of exercise participation. Regardless of severity, an injury typically results in the athlete's short- or long-term removal from participation. Nutritional interventions may augment the recovery process and support optimal healing; therefore, incorporating nutritional strategies is important at each stage of the healing process. Preoperative nutrition and nutritional demands during rehabilitation are key factors to consider. The physiological response to wounds, immobilization, and traumatic brain injuries may be improved by optimizing macronutrient composition, caloric consumption, and nutrient timing and using select dietary supplements. Previous research supports practical nutrition recommendations to reduce surgical complications, minimize deficits after immobilization, and maximize the chance of safe return to play. These recommendations include identifying the individual's caloric requirements to ensure that energy needs are being met. A higher protein intake, with special attention to evenly distributed consumption throughout the day, will help to minimize loss of muscle and strength during immobilization. Dietary-supplement strategies may be useful when navigating the challenges of appropriate caloric intake and timing and a reduced appetite. The rehabilitation process also requires a strong nutritional plan to enhance recovery from injury. Athletic trainers, physical therapists, and other health care professionals should provide basic nutritional recommendations during rehabilitation, discuss the timing of meals with respect to therapy, and refer the patient to a registered dietitian if warranted. Because nutrition plays an essential role in injury recovery and rehabilitation, nutritional interventions should become a component of standard-of-care practice after injury. In this article, we address best practices for implementing nutritional strategies among patients with athletic injuries.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesDietary SupplementsNutrition PolicyEnergy IntakeExerciseHumansNutritional RequirementsSports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

Identifiers

PMID32991705
PMCPMC7534941
OpenAlexW3089620720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.