ArticlePloS one2020
Sex-based differences in sub-technique selection during an international classical cross-country skiing competition.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Olympic Snow Sports: Current Insights and Future Directions for Milano Cortina 2026 and Beyond.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Review
- Micro-pacing and performance determinants in skiathlon: linking speed profiles, sub-technique selection, and cycle characteristics.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Sex differences in speed and sub-technique selection in elite sprint cross-country skiers: a time-trial qualification analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- From juniors to seniors: changes in training characteristics and aerobic power in 17 world-class cross-country skiers.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- The role of external power demand on the choice of technique in classic cross-country skiing.PloS one · 2023Article
- A Comparison of Double Poling Physiology and Kinematics Between Long-Distance and All-Round Cross-Country Skiers.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- The Modern Double-Poling Technique Is Not More Energy Efficient Than the Old-Fashioned Double-Poling Technique at a Submaximal Work Intensity.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- The influence of race tactics for performance in the heats of an international sprint cross-country skiing competition.PloS one · 2022Article
- Framework for In-Field Analyses of Performance and Sub-Technique Selection in Standing Para Cross-Country Skiers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Preparing for the Nordic Skiing Events at the Beijing Olympics in 2022: Evidence-Based Recommendations and Unanswered Questions.Journal of science in sport and exercise · 2021Article
- The Training Characteristics of World-Class Male Long-Distance Cross-Country Skiers.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- Comparisons of Macro-Kinematic Strategies During the Rounds of a Cross-Country Skiing Sprint Competition in Classic Technique.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare speed, sub-technique selection and temporal patterns between world-class male and female cross-country (XC) skiers and to examine the combined associations of sex and speed on sub-technique selection. Thirty-three XC skiers performed an international 10-km (women; n = 8) and 15-km (men; n = 25) time-trial competition in the classical style (with the first 10 km of the race being used for analyses). An integrated GNSS/IMU system was used to continuously track position speed and automatically classify sub-techniques and temporal patterns (i.e. cycle length and-rate). When comparing the eight highest ranked men and women, men spent less time than women (29±2 vs. 45±5% of total time) using diagonal stride (DIA), more time (44±4 vs. 31±4%) using double poling (DP) and more time (23±2 vs. 19±3%) using tucking and turning (all P < .01). Here, men and women used these sub-techniques at similar temporal patterns within the same speed-intervals; although men employed all sub-techniques at steeper uphill gradients (all P < .05). In subsequent analyses including all 33 skiers, adjustment for average racing speed did not fully attenuate the observed sex differences in the proportion of time using DIA (CI95% [-10.7, -1.6]) and DP (CI95% [0.8, 9.3]). Male world-class XC skiers utilized less DIA and more DP compared to women of equal performance levels. Although these differences coincided with men's higher speed and their ability to use the various sub-techniques at steeper uphill gradients, sexual dimorphism in the proportional use of DIA and DP also occurred independently of these speed-differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.