Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32991606›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Efficacy and safety of short-term use of a pelubiprofen CR and aceclofenac in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: A double-blinded, randomized, multicenter, active drug comparative, parallel-group, phase IV, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Joung Youp Shin, Moon Jong Chang, Myung Ku Kim, Seung-Baik Kang, Kang-Il Kim, Hee Gon Park, Sahnghoon Lee, Sung-Hwan Kim, Seung-Beom Han, Han Jun Lee and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Joung Youp ShinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Moon Jong ChangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Myung Ku KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4171-8831
Seung-Baik KangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kang-Il KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hee Gon ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Sahnghoon LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Hwan KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Beom HanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Han Jun LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Wan MoonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Doo YooDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Ewha Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-7080
Seoul National University · KRChung-Ang University · KRDankook University Hospital · KREwha Womans University Medical Center · KRInha University Hospital · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKyung Hee University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAt present, information about clinical efficacy and adverse events of controlled release (CR) form of pelubiprofen, a prodrug of 2-arylopropionic acid with relatively selective effects on cyclooxygenase-2 activity, remains scarce. In this study, we sought to determine non-inferiority of pelubiprofen CR 90 mg/day compared to aceclofenac 200 mg/day regarding clinical efficacy and adverse events after a 4-week course of medication in the patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 191 patients were randomly assigned to take either pelubiprofen CR 90 mg (n = 95) or aceclofenac 200 mg (n = 96). The primary outcome variable was non-inferiority of pain reduction between baseline and week 4 when assessed using a 100 mm pain visual analogue scale (VAS). Pelubiprofen was considered non-inferior to aceclofenac if the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the difference in terms of pain VAS was above 15 mm (the average change of pain VAS in the pelubiprofen group-pain VAS reduction in the aceclofenac group). Secondary outcome variables were the changes in 100 mm pain VAS at week 2 versus baseline, K-Western Ontario, and McMaster University Arthritis Index (K-WOMAC) changes at weeks 2 and 4 as compared to baseline, patient global assessment at weeks 2 and 4. The frequency and amount of rescue medicine usage at weeks 2 and 4 were also evaluated as the secondary outcome variable. For safety analysis, adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and physical examinations were assessed and conducted at each follow-up visit.

resultsAt week 4, the pain VAS values were significantly reduced in both groups receiving either pelubiprofen CR 90 mg or aceclofenac 200 mg as compared to the baseline. However, the pelubiprofen group and the aceclofenac group respectively showed the pain VAS changes of -22 and -21.9 in the pre-protocol set and -20.8 and -21.7 in the full analysis set, confirming non-inferiority. The pelubiprofen CR 90 mg showed a reduced incidence of adverse events compared to the aceclofenac 200 mg (p = 0.005).

conclusionsPelubiprofen CR 90 mg is as effective as aceclofenac 200 mg with reduced adverse events for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementPatient SafetyPhenylpropionatesTreatment OutcomeaceclofenacAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacpelubiprofenPhenylpropionates

Identifiers

PMID32991606
PMCPMC7523996
OpenAlexW3091627859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.