ArticleMedicine2020
Herbal medicine Siho-sogan-san for functional dyspepsia: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complementary and alternative medicine for functional dyspepsia: An Asian perspective.Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional dyspepsia (FD) is characterized by persistent and recurrent dyspeptic symptoms, such as postprandial fullness and epigastric pain. Although it is rarely severe or life-threatening, it can degrade the quality of life and cause social and economic issues. As symptoms often persist despite the treatment with conventional Western medicine, herbal medicine can be considered as an alternative for treating FD. Siho-sogan-san (SHS) is a traditional herbal formula prescribed for dyspepsia for hundreds of years. This protocol for a systematic review was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SHS for the treatment of FD through a meta-analysis.
methodsStudies will be searched from the following electronic databases up to March 2020: Embase, MEDLINE (via PubMED), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Korean Medical Database, KoreaMed, Korean Studies Information Service System, National Digital Science Library, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, and Citation Information by Nii. Randomized controlled trials of SHS and herb-added SHS for treating FD will be selected in this review. The control groups of no-treatment, placebo, and conventional Western medicine will be compared with SHS for its efficacy. The synergetic effect of SHS with Western medicine will also be analyzed in comparison with conventional Western medicine alone. Two independent reviewers will collect the data and assess the risk of bias in individual studies. The total clinical effectiveness rate will be synthesized and evaluated as primary outcome.
resultsThis systematic review will present an adequate clinical evidence of SHS for the treatment of FD based on specific parameters, including dyspepsia-related symptoms, gastric emptying, and adverse events.
conclusionThis study will provide evidence for the safety and efficacy of SHS for the treatment of patients with FD. REVIEW REGISTRY UNIQUE IDENTIFYING NUMBER:: reviewregistry952.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.