ArticleMedicine2020
Identification of potential gene drivers of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of microarray data.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implications of canonical histone H3.1 and histone variant H3.3 in cancer.Open biology · 2025Review
- From actinic keratosis to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: the key pathogenesis and treatments.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The Mutational and Microenvironmental Landscape of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Incorporation of the 40-Gene Expression Profile (40-GEP) Test to Improve Treatment Decisions in High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) Patients: Case Series and Algorithm.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023Article
- Article
- Significant Biomarkers Identification Associated with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Dysregulation of Circadian Clock Genes Associated with Tumor Immunity and Prognosis in Patients with Colon Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common skin cancer with an increasing incidence. As a pre-cancerous condition, actinic keratosis (AK) has an up to 20% risk of progression to cSCC. This study aims to define the potential genes that associated with genesis and progression of cSCC, thereby further identify critical biomarkers for the prevention, early diagnosis, and effective treatment of cSCC.Two datasets GSE42677 and GSE45216 were downloaded from the GEO. Microarray data analysis was applied to explore the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cSCC samples and AK samples. Then functional enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, and drug-gene interaction analysis were performed to screen key genes.A total of 711 DEGs, including 238 upregulated genes and 473 downregulated genes, were screened out. DEGs mainly involved in pathways as extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction, hematopoietic cell lineage, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K-Akt) signaling pathway, and focal adhesion. Candidate genes, including upregulated genes as JUN, filamin A (FLNA), casein kinase 1 delta (CSNK1D), and histone cluster 1 H3 family member f (HIST1H3F), and downregulated genes as androgen receptor (AR), heat shock protein family H member 1 (HSPH1), tropomyosin 1 (TPM1), pyruvate kinase, muscle (PKM), LIM domain and actin binding 1 (LIMA1), and synaptopodin (SYNPO) were screened out. In drug-gene interaction analysis, 13 genes and 44 drugs were identified.This study demonstrates that genes JUN, FLNA, AR, HSPH1, and CSNK1D have the potential to function as targets for diagnosis and treatment of cSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.