Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32991417›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Psychological effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in elderly patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A protocol of systematic review.

Bing Chen, Xiu-Yu Liu, Hong-Mei Zhang, Bai-Jun Zhang, Ying-Ting Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bing ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University.
Xiu-Yu LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University.
Hong-Mei ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University.
Bai-Jun ZhangDepartment of Emergency, Mudanjiang Forestry Central Hospital.
Ying-Ting WangDepartment of Geriatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5042-2090
Mudanjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to assess the psychological effect of comprehensive nursing intervention (CNI) in elderly patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU).

methodsThis protocol will search all potential studies from inception to the present in electronic database sources (Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, PsycINFO, WANGFANG, CBM, and CNKI), and other sources (such as clinical trial registry, and conference proceedings). We will not apply limitations to language and publication status. Two independent authors will scan literature, extract data, and appraise study quality. A third author will be invited to solve any disagreements between 2 authors. We will utilize RevMan 5.3 software for statistical analysis. If necessary, we will also carry out subgroup group, sensitivity analysis, and reporting bias.

resultsThis protocol will summarize high quality evidence to evaluate the psychological effect of CNI in elderly patients with PPU.

conclusionThe results of this study may provide evidence to determine whether CNI is effective or not on psychological effect in elderly patients with PPU. STUDY REGISTRATION: INPLASY202080069.

Indexed as

AgedHumansPeptic Ulcer PerforationQuality of LifeSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID32991417
PMCPMC7523801
OpenAlexW3079806264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.