Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32991214›Full record

ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

How Should Cancer Models Be Constructed?

Robert A Beckman, Irina Kareva, Frederick R Adler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Treatment of evolving cancers will require dynamic decision support.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Reply to M. Younes.JCO precision oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert A BeckmanDepartments of Oncology and Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, & Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, 12231Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Irina KarevaMathematical and Computational Sciences Center, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, 7864Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Frederick R AdlerSchool of Biological Sciences, 415772University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9022-3157
Arizona State University · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Project 2: Targeting Cooperative Phenotypes Common in Spatial HeterogeneityU54CA209978 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BILD, ANDREA HOPE · 2017 to 2021
$10.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choosing and optimizing treatment strategies for cancer requires capturing its complex dynamics sufficiently well for understanding but without being overwhelmed. Mathematical models are essential to achieve this understanding, and we discuss the challenge of choosing the right level of complexity to address the full range of tumor complexity from growth, the generation of tumor heterogeneity, and interactions within tumors and with treatments and the tumor microenvironment. We discuss the differences between conceptual and descriptive models, and compare the use of predator-prey models, evolutionary game theory, and dynamic precision medicine approaches in the face of uncertainty about mechanisms and parameter values. Although there is of course no one-size-fits-all approach, we conclude that broad and flexible thinking about cancer, based on combined modeling approaches, will play a key role in finding creative and improved treatments.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGame TheoryModels, BiologicalHumansNeoplasmsPopulation DynamicsTumor Microenvironmentcancer ecologycancer ecology and evolutioncancer evolutionmathematical oncologytheoretical models

Identifiers

PMID32991214
PMCPMC7791451
OpenAlexW3089379169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.