Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990985›Full record

ArticleInternational endodontic journal2021

Biofilm removal from a simulated isthmus and lateral canal during syringe irrigation at various flow rates: a combined experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics approach.

T C Pereira, C Boutsioukis, R J B Dijkstra, X Petridis, M Versluis, F B de Andrade, W J van de Meer, P K Sharma, L W M van der Sluis, M V R So

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International endodontic journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Evaluation of root-canal isthmus debridement efficacy of 3 kinds of activated irrigation technique.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

T C PereiraDepartment of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3390-9371
C BoutsioukisDepartment of Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-1034
R J B DijkstraCenter for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
X PetridisCenter for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3449-231X
M VersluisPhysics of Fluids group, Technical Medical (TechMed) Center and MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-1860
F B de AndradeDepartment of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1238-2160
W J van de MeerDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
P K SharmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
L W M van der SluisCenter for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M V R SoConservative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre-Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1393-5900
University Medical Center Groningen · NLAcademic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

Abel Tasman Talent ProgramCNPqConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorEuropean Society of Endodontologythe Abel Tasman Talent Program (ATTP) of the Graduate School of Medical Sciences of the University of Groningen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim(i) To quantify biofilm removal from a simulated isthmus and a lateral canal in an artificial root canal system during syringe irrigation with NaOCl at different concentrations and delivered at various flow rates (ii) to examine whether biofilm removal is further improved by a final high-flow-rate rinse with an inert irrigant following irrigation with NaOCl. (iii) to simulate the irrigant flow in these areas using a computer model (iv) to examine whether the irrigant velocity calculated by the computer model is correlated to biofilm removal. METHODOLOGY: Ninety-six artificial root canals with either a simulated isthmus or lateral canal were used. A dual-species in vitro biofilm was formed in these areas using a Constant Depth Film Fermenter. NaOCl at various concentrations (2, 5 and 10%) or adhesion buffer (control) was delivered for 30 s by a syringe and an open-ended needle at 0.033, 0.083, or 0.166 mL s

resultsThe flow rate during phase 1 and additional irrigation during phase 2 had a significant effect on the percentage of the remaining biofilm in the isthmus (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001). Additional irrigation during phase 2 also affected the remaining biofilm in the lateral canal significantly (P ≤ 0.007) but only when preceded by irrigation at medium or high flow rate during phase 1. The effect of NaOCl concentration was not significant (P > 0.05). Irrigant velocity in the isthmus and lateral canal increased with increasing flow rate and it was substantially correlated to biofilm removal from those areas.

conclusionsThe irrigant flow rate affected biofilm removal in vitro more than NaOCl concentration. Irrigant velocity predicted by the computer model corresponded with the pattern of biofilm removal from the simulated isthmus and lateral canal.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityRoot Canal IrrigantsBiofilmsHydrodynamicsRoot Canal PreparationSodium HypochloriteSyringesTherapeutic IrrigationRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium Hypochloritebiofilmisthmuslateral canalsodium hypochloritevelocity

Identifiers

PMID32990985
PMCPMC7894139
OpenAlexW3089469162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.