SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020
Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of herbal medicines for glycaemic control and insulin resistance in individuals with type 2 diabetes: an umbrella review.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Pooled it
- Does supplementation with pine bark extract improve cardiometabolic risk factors? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Pooled it
- Therapeutic Efficacy of Flavonoids in Allergies: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of immunology research · 2022Pooled it
- Neuroprotective effects of Pycnogenol on nerve regeneration and functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush injury in rodents.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rhabdomyolysis Associated With Excess Pycnogenol (Maritime Pine Bark Extract): A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- The role of programmed cell death in diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction: from mechanisms to targeted therapy.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Review
- Review
- Optimization of Green Extraction Techniques for Polyphenolics inACS omega · 2024Article
- An Update on New and Existing Treatments for the Management of Melasma.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024Review
- Enhancing pediatric attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder treatment: exploring the gut microbiota effects of French maritime pine bark extract and methylphenidate intervention.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Review of the pharmacokinetics of French maritime pine bark extract (PycnogenolFrontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- Chemometric analysis of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes of conifers.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Dietary Polyphenols-Natural Bioactive Compounds with Potential for Preventing and Treating Some Allergic Conditions.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Micronized Palmitoylethanolamide, Hempseed Oil, and Maritime Pine Bark Dry Extract (PelvipeaCells · 2023Article
- The common indoor air pollutant α-pinene is metabolised to a genotoxic metabolite α-pinene oxide.Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems · 2022Article
- Article
- Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Natural Drugs.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPine bark (Pinus spp.) extract is rich in bioflavonoids, predominantly proanthocyanidins, which are antioxidants. Commercially-available extract supplements are marketed for preventing or treating various chronic conditions associated with oxidative stress. This is an update of a previously published review.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of pine bark extract supplements for treating chronic disorders. SEARCH
methodsWe searched three databases and three trial registries; latest search: 30 September 2019. We contacted the manufacturers of pine bark extracts to identify additional studies and hand-searched bibliographies of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pine bark extract supplements in adults or children with any chronic disorder. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we pooled data in meta-analyses. We used GRADE to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Primary outcomes were participant- and investigator-reported clinical outcomes directly related to each disorder and all-cause mortality. We also assessed adverse events and biomarkers of oxidative stress. MAIN
resultsThis review included 27 RCTs (22 parallel and five cross-over designs; 1641 participants) evaluating pine bark extract supplements across 10 chronic disorders: asthma (two studies; 86 participants); attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (one study; 61 participants), cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors (seven studies; 338 participants), chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) (two studies; 60 participants), diabetes mellitus (DM) (six studies; 339 participants), erectile dysfunction (three studies; 277 participants), female sexual dysfunction (one study; 83 participants), osteoarthritis (three studies; 293 participants), osteopenia (one study; 44 participants) and traumatic brain injury (one study; 60 participants). Two studies exclusively recruited children; the remainder recruited adults. Trials lasted between four weeks and six months. Placebo was the control in 24 studies. Overall risk of bias was low for four, high for one and unclear for 22 studies. In adults with asthma, we do not know whether pine bark extract increases change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV AUTHORS'
conclusionsSmall sample sizes, limited numbers of RCTs per condition, variation in outcome measures, and poor reporting of the included RCTs mean no definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy or safety of pine bark extract supplements are possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.