Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990845›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2020

Brain Metabolism and Structure in Chronic Migraine.

Kuan-Lin Lai, David M Niddam

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Sub-MicroliterJournal of neurochemistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kuan-Lin LaiDepartment of Neurology, The Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
David M NiddamBrain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. niddam@ym.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4488-9310
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare 109-TDU-B-211-114001Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 105-2628-B-010-011-MY2Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 107-2314-B-010-018-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2321-B-010-014-MY2Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 109-2314-B-075-049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this paper is to review and synthesize current literature in which neurochemical and structural brain imaging were used to investigate chronic migraine (CM) pathophysiology and to further discuss the clinical implications. RECENT

findingsSpectroscopic and structural MRI studies have shown the presence of both impaired metabolism and structural alterations in the brain of CM patients. Metabolic changes in key brain regions support the notion of altered energetics and homeostasis as part of CM pathophysiology. Furthermore, CM, like other chronic pain disorders, may undergo structural reorganization in pain-related brain regions following near persistent endogenous painful input. Finally, both imaging techniques may provide potential biomarkers of disease state and progression and may help guide novel therapeutic interventions or strategies. Spectroscopic and structural MRI have revealed novel aspects of CM pathophysiology. Findings from the former support the metabolic theory of migraine pathogenesis.

Indexed as

BrainHeadache DisordersHumansMigraine DisordersCreatineEnergy deficiencyMagnetic resonance spectroscopyMedication overuse headacheSurface-based morphometryVoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID32990845
OpenAlexW3089620070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.