Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990778›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2020

Invasive candidiasis in critical care: challenges and future directions.

C Logan, I Martin-Loeches, T Bicanic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of EarlyAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. CLEC3A-derived peptides exhibit broad-spectrum activity againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

C LoganInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.
I Martin-LoechesMultidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St. James's Hospital/Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. drmartinloeches@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-4063
T BicanicInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.
St George's, University of London · GBTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

MRF_ MRF-160-0009-ELP-BICA-C0802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive candidiasis is the most common critical care-associated fungal infection with a crude mortality of ~ 40-55%. Important factors contributing to risk of invasive candidiasis in ICU include use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, immunosuppressive drugs, and total parenteral nutrition alongside iatrogenic interventions which breach natural barriers to infection [vascular catheters, renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), surgery]. This review discusses three key challenges in this field. The first is the shift in Candida epidemiology across the globe to more resistant non-albicans species, in particular, the emergence of multi-resistant Candida glabrata and Candida auris, which pose significant treatment and infection control challenges in critical care. The second challenge lies in the timely and appropriate initiation and discontinuation of antifungal therapy. Early antifungal strategies (prophylaxis, empirical and pre-emptive) using tools such as the Candida colonisation index, clinical prediction rules and fungal non-culture-based tests have been developed: we review the evidence on implementation of these tools in critical care to aid clinical decision-making around the prescribing and cessation of antifungal therapy. The third challenge is selection of the most appropriate antifungal to use in critical care patients. While guidelines exist to aid choice, this heterogenous and complex patient group require a more tailored approach, particularly in cases of acute kidney injury, liver impairment and for patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We highlight key research priorities to overcome these challenges in the future.

Indexed as

Candidiasis, InvasiveAntifungal AgentsCandidaCritical CareHumansAntifungal AgentsAntifungalBiomarkersCandidiasisCritical careFungal

Identifiers

PMID32990778
OpenAlexW3089935159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.