Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990774›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Safety and early results of Subchondroplasty® for the treatment of bone marrow lesions in osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Leah N Nairn, Maegha Subramaniam, Seper Ekhtiari, Daniel E Axelrod, John A Grant, Moin Khan

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leah N NairnMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Maegha SubramaniamFaculty of Science, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Seper EkhtiariDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Daniel E AxelrodDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
John A GrantDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedSport, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Moin KhanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada. khanmm2@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-8095
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Michigan · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSubchondroplasty® is a novel minimally invasive procedure for painful subchondral bone marrow lesions (BMLs). The aim of this systematic review was to characterize the clinical outcomes of the Subchondroplasty® procedure, a novel minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of BMLs. The hypothesis tested was that patients experience improvements in pain and functional outcomes following the Subchondroplasty® procedure.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched from database inception to search date (June 10, 2020) for all clinical studies which discussed Subchondroplasty®. Two reviewers independently screened 45 unique results and 17 studies were included in the final analysis. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, indications, pain, functional scores, conversion to TKA, and complications of the procedure.

resultsAll but one study were level IV evidence; the mean MINORS score was 9 ± 2. There were 756 patients included, 45.1% were female, and the mean age was 54 years (range 20-85). Thirteen studies investigated the effect Subchondroplasty® to the knee, while four studied the impact on the foot and ankle. Median length of follow-up was 12 months. The most common indication for Subchondroplasty® was joint pain with corresponding BML. Major contraindications to Subchondroplasty® included severe OA, joint instability, and malalignment. Mean pain score on visual analogue scale (VAS) prior to Subchondroplasty® was 7.8 ± 0.6, but decreased to 3.4 ± 0.7 postoperatively. All studies investigating functional scores reported improvement following Subchondroplasty® (IKDC 31.7 ± 1.9-54.0 ± 4.2 and KOOS 38.1 ± 0.6-70.0 ± 4.1). There were consistently high levels of patient satisfaction; 87 ± 8% of patients would be willing to undergo the procedure again. Seven cases of complications were reported, most seriously osteomyelitis and avascular necrosis. Conversion to knee arthroplasty ranged from 12.5 to 30% with length of follow-up ranging from 10 months to 7 years.

conclusionsExisting low-quality studies show Subchondroplasty® to benefit patients with BMLs through reduction in pain and improvement in function, along with a high degree of satisfaction following the procedure. The low short-to-medium term conversion rate to arthroplasty suggests that Subchondroplasty® may play a role in delaying more invasive and expensive procedures in patients with BMLs. Subchondroplasty® is a novel procedure that has promising initial findings, but requires further high-quality, comparative studies with long-term follow-up to better understand the outcomes of the procedure and impact clinical practice recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review of Level III and IV Studies, Level IV.

Indexed as

Cartilage DiseasesOsteoarthritis, KneeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthralgiaBone MarrowFemaleHumansKnee JointMiddle AgedYoung AdultBone marrow lesionsCalcium phosphateOsteoarthritisSubchondroplasty®

Identifiers

PMID32990774
OpenAlexW3091216485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.