ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2021
Assessing statistical similarity in dietary intakes of women of reproductive age in Bangladesh.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food consumption patterns and nutrient adequacy across lifecycle stages in Bangladesh.PloS one · 2026Article
- Equivalence of Type 2 Diabetes Prevalence Estimates: Comparative Study of Similar Phenotyping Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Multivariate Adjustments for Average Equivalence Testing.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- A review of the dietary diversity and micronutrient adequacy among the women of reproductive age in low- and middle-income countries.Food science & nutrition · 2024Review
- Factors associated with child and maternal dietary diversity in the urban areas of Bangladesh.Food science & nutrition · 2024Article
- Diets of Men and Women in Rural Bangladesh Are Equitable but Suboptimal.Current developments in nutrition · 2023Article
- Dietary diversity and micronutrients adequacy among the women of reproductive age at St. Martin's island in Bangladesh.BMC nutrition · 2023Article
- Assessment of nutrient adequacy and associated factors among lactating women of rural Bangladesh using observed intake: Findings from Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey 2018-2019.Food science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Trends and Inequities in Food, Energy, Protein, Fat, and Carbohydrate Intakes in Rural Bangladesh.The Journal of nutrition · 2022Article
- A Preliminary Study on a Form of the 24-h Recall That Balances Survey Cost and Accuracy, Based on the NCI Method.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Article
- Consumption of animal source foods, especially fish, is associated with better nutritional status among women of reproductive age in rural Bangladesh.Maternal & child nutrition · 2022Observational
- Assessing statistical similarity in dietary intakes of women of reproductive age in Bangladesh.Maternal & child nutrition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women of reproductive age (WRA) need adequate nutrient intakes to sustain a healthy pregnancy, support fetal growth, and breastfeed after childbirth. However, data on women's dietary intake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are limited, and assessment of differences between dietary intakes of pregnant or lactating women compared with that of nonpregnant, nonlactating (NPNL) women is untested. Using single, multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall data from a sample of WRA residing in rural Bangladesh, we examined women's dietary intakes for energy, protein, calcium, iron, vitamin A, and dietary diversity for three groups: NPNL (n = 2,903), pregnant (n = 197), and lactating women (n = 944). We used equivalence testing to examine similarity in adjusted intakes for pregnant versus NPNL women and lactating versus NPNL women with a predetermined equivalence threshold based on recommendations specific for each reproductive stage. On average, both pregnant and lactating women had insufficient intakes for all dietary measures. Although statistically significant differences were observed between pregnant and NPNL women for energy intake and dietary diversity and between lactating and NPNL women for energy and protein intake, the magnitudes of these differences were too small to reject equivalence. Statistical similarity was also evident in all micronutrients and dietary diversity for both two-group comparisons. Understanding statistical differences and similarities between dietary measures of women in distinct reproductive stages has important implications for the relevance, appropriateness, and evaluation of maternal diet-enhancing interventions in LMICs, especially during pregnancy and lactation, when demand for macronutrients and micronutrients is elevated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.