Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990371›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2020

Deductive-reasoning brain networks: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of the neural signatures in deductive reasoning.

Li Wang, Meng Zhang, Feng Zou, Xin Wu, Yufeng Wang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li WangDepartment of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China.
Meng ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2219-3128
Feng ZouDepartment of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China.
Xin WuDepartment of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China.
Yufeng WangDepartment of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31600927National Natural Science Foundation of China 81830040the humanities and social science research Project of Henan Colleges and Universities 2021-ZZJH-308the Key scientific research projects of colleges and universities in Henan province 20A190001the Youth Foundation of Social Science and Humanity, China Ministry of Education 19YJCZH179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeductive reasoning is a complex and poorly understood concept in the field of psychology. Many cognitive neuroscience studies have been published on deductive reasoning but have yielded inconsistent findings.

methodsIn this study, we analyzed collected data from 38 articles using a recently proposed activation likelihood estimation (ALE) approach and used conjunction analysis to better determine the intersection of the results of meta-analyses.

resultsFirst, the left hemispheres in the inferior parietal lobule (Brodmann area 40 [BA40]), middle frontal gyrus (BA6), medial frontal gyrus (BA8), inferior frontal gyrus (BA45/46), caudate, and insula (BA47) were revealed to be significant brain regions via simple-effect analysis (deductive reasoning versus baseline). Furthermore, IFG, insula, and cingulate (the key neural hubs of the cingulo-opercular network) were highlighted in overlapped functional connectivity maps.

conclusionThe findings of the current study are consistent with the view that deductive reasoning requires a succession of stages, which included decoding of linguistic information, conversion and correction of rules, and transformation of inferential results into conclusive outputs, all of which are putatively processed via a distributed network of brain regions encompassing frontal/parietal cortices, as well as the caudate and other subcortical structures, which suggested that in the process of deductive reasoning, the coding and integration of premise information is indispensable, and it is also crucial to the execution and monitoring of the cognitive processing of reasoning.

Indexed as

BrainProblem SolvingBrain MappingFrontal LobeMagnetic Resonance ImagingParietal Lobeactivation likelihood estimationdeductive reasoningmeta-analysisMRI studies

Identifiers

PMID32990371
PMCPMC7749517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.