Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990249›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Novel Brain-Computer Interface Neuromodulative Intervention to Relieve Neuropathic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Single-Case Experimental Design With Multiple Baselines.

Negin Hesam-Shariati, Toby Newton-John, Avinash K Singh, Carlos A Tirado Cortes, Tien-Thong Nguyen Do, Ashley Craig, James W Middleton, Mark P Jensen, Zina Trost, Chin-Teng Lin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Negin Hesam-ShariatiCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0829-7016
Toby Newton-JohnGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4219-4985
Avinash K SinghSchool of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-9695
Carlos A Tirado CortesSchool of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-0914
Tien-Thong Nguyen DoSchool of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-5944
Ashley CraigJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-7604
James W MiddletonJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-8619
Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3392-9767
Zina TrostDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-0337
Chin-Teng LinSchool of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-8197
Sylvia M GustinCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9613-9845
University of Technology Sydney · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Washington · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuropathic pain is a debilitating secondary condition for many individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal cord injury neuropathic pain often is poorly responsive to existing pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. A growing body of evidence supports the potential for brain-computer interface systems to reduce spinal cord injury neuropathic pain via electroencephalographic neurofeedback. However, further studies are needed to provide more definitive evidence regarding the effectiveness of this intervention.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multiday course of a brain-computer interface neuromodulative intervention in a gaming environment to provide pain relief for individuals with neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury.

methodsWe have developed a novel brain-computer interface-based neuromodulative intervention for spinal cord injury neuropathic pain. Our brain-computer interface neuromodulative treatment includes an interactive gaming interface, and a neuromodulation protocol targeted to suppress theta (4-8 Hz) and high beta (20-30 Hz) frequency powers, and enhance alpha (9-12 Hz) power. We will use a single-case experimental design with multiple baselines to examine the effectiveness of our self-developed brain-computer interface neuromodulative intervention for the treatment of spinal cord injury neuropathic pain. We will recruit 3 participants with spinal cord injury neuropathic pain. Each participant will be randomly allocated to a different baseline phase (ie, 7, 10, or 14 days), which will then be followed by 20 sessions of a 30-minute brain-computer interface neuromodulative intervention over a 4-week period. The visual analog scale assessing average pain intensity will serve as the primary outcome measure. We will also assess pain interference as a secondary outcome domain. Generalization measures will assess quality of life, sleep quality, and anxiety and depressive symptoms, as well as resting-state electroencephalography and thalamic γ-aminobutyric acid concentration.

resultsThis study was approved by the Human Research Committees of the University of New South Wales in July 2019 and the University of Technology Sydney in January 2020. We plan to begin the trial in October 2020 and expect to publish the results by the end of 2021.

conclusionsThis clinical trial using single-case experimental design methodology has been designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel brain-computer interface neuromodulative treatment for people with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. Single-case experimental designs are considered a viable alternative approach to randomized clinical trials to identify evidence-based practices in the field of technology-based health interventions when recruitment of large samples is not feasible.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12620000556943; https://bit.ly/2RY1jRx. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/20979.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfacebrain-machine interfaceEEG neurofeedbackneuropathic painserious gamessingle-case experimental designspinal cord injurythalamus

Identifiers

PMID32990249
PMCPMC7556378
OpenAlexW3081546337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.