ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Safety and Efficacy of the Metabolic Profiling of the BIMRT Utilizing 18F FDG PET-CT.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 55 patients with peritoneal metastases were treated with 18F-FDG-PET/CT-guided IMRT (BIMRT) from January 2012 to January 2019. They were prescribed with a fraction of the median dose of 2 Gy to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. The multivariate analysis was used the Cox proportional hazard model and the Kaplan-Meier plot was used to perform local control rate (LCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) analysis.
resultsThe 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year LCR were 72.7%, 36.4%, and 9.1%, respectively; the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year PFS were 69.1%, 30.9%, and 7.3%, respectively, and the median PFS time was 18 months. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS were 70.9%, 28.7%, and 4.2%, respectively. Based on the multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model, the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score and radiotherapy joint chemotherapy (RJC) method were independent prognostic-related indicators (P < 0.0001).
conclusionBIMRT may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with peritoneal metastases, especially for patients who cannot undergo surgery. In addition, the results indicated that the patient's KPS score and RJC method were independent prognostic-related indicators for patients survival time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.