Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990041›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2020

Effectiveness and Cost of Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among an Underserved Population in Chicago.

Karen E Kim, Florence K L Tangka, Manasi Jayaprakash, Fornessa T Randal, Helen Lam, David Freedman, Laurie A Carrier, Coletta Sargant, Chieko Maene, Sonja Hoover and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karen E KimUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Florence K L TangkaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Manasi JayaprakashUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Fornessa T RandalUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Helen LamUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
David FreedmanHeartland Health Centers, Chicago, IL, USA.
Laurie A CarrierHeartland Health Centers, Chicago, IL, USA.
Coletta SargantHeartland Health Centers, Chicago, IL, USA.
Chieko MaeneUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sonja HooverRTI International, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-1212
Djenaba JosephCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cynthia FrenchCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sujha SubramanianRTI International, Waltham, MA, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USHeartland Alliance · USRTI International · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program, The University of Chicago Center for Asian Health Equity partnered with a federally qualified health center (FQHC) to implement multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in order to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost of implementing a provider reminder system entered manually and supplemented with patient reminders and provider assessment and feedback. The FQHC collected demographic characteristics of the FQHC and outcome data from January 2015 through December 2015 (preimplementation period) and cost from January 2016 through September 2017 (implementation period). Cost data were collected for the implementation period. We report on the demographics of the eligible population, CRC screening order, completion rates by sociodemographic characteristics, and, overall, the effectiveness and cost of implementation. From the preimplementation phase to the implementation phase, there was a 21.2 percentage point increase in CRC screens completed. The total cost of implementing EBIs was $40908.97. We estimated that an additional 283 screens were completed because of the interventions, and the implementation cost of the interventions was $144.65 per additional screen. With the interventions, CRC screening uptake in Chicago increased for all race/ethnicity and demographic backgrounds at the FQHC, particularly for patients aged 50 to 64 years and for Asian, Hispanic, and uninsured patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerChicagoEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedVulnerable Populationscancer disparitiescancer screeningChicagocolorectal cancereconomic evaluationfederally qualified health centers

Identifiers

PMID32990041
PMCPMC7894065
OpenAlexW3091453270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.