Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990034›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2021

The Role of Spinal Orthoses in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures of the Elderly Population (Age 60 Years or Older): Systematic Review.

Barry Ting Sheen Kweh, Hui Qing Lee, Terence Tan, Joost Rutges, Travis Marion, Kim Siong Tew, Vikram Bhalla, Shyaman Menon, Fetullah Cumhur Oner, Charles Fisher and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The development and validation of a prediction model for imminent vertebral osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of different cement distribution on the clinical efficacy of vertebral compression fractures in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The changing landscape of spinal injuries: A narrative review.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Barry Ting Sheen Kweh5390National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9130-1543
Hui Qing Lee5390National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Terence Tan5390National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2145-0214
Joost Rutges6993Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9452-415X
Travis Marion26627Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Kim Siong Tew5644Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Vikram Bhalla5644Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shyaman Menon5644Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Fetullah Cumhur Oner8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Charles FisherUniversity of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jin Wee Tee5390National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The Alfred Hospital · AUPeninsula Health · AUErasmus MC · NLNOSM University · CAUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic review.

objectiveSpinal orthoses have been generally used in the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the elderly population with purported positive biomechanical and functional effects. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of the literature examining the role of spinal orthoses in osteoporotic elderly patients who sustain low energy trauma vertebral fractures.

methodsA systematic literature review adherent to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted. Methodical searches utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Databases was performed.

resultsOf the 2019 articles initially retrieved, 7 published articles (4 randomized controlled trials and 3 prospective cohort studies) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Five studies reported improvement in quantitative measurements of spinal column stability when either a rigid or semirigid orthosis was used, while 1 study was equivocal. The studies also showed the translation of biomechanical benefit into significant functional improvement as manifested by improved postural stability and reduced body sway. Subjective improvement in pain scores and quality of life was also noted with bracing.

conclusionThe use of spinal orthoses in neurologically intact elderly patients aged 60 years and older with osteoporotic compression vertebral fractures results in improved biomechanical vertebral stability, reduced kyphotic deformity, enhanced postural stability, greater muscular strength and superior functional outcomes.

Indexed as

bracesorthotic devicesosteoporotic fracturesspinal fractures

Identifiers

PMID32990034
PMCPMC8258809
OpenAlexW3089910542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.