Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32989888›Full record

Trial reportAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2021

Rapid Administration of Methoxyflurane to Patients in the Emergency Department (RAMPED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Care.

Lisa Brichko, Ravali Gaddam, Cristina Roman, Gerard O'Reilly, Carl Luckhoff, Paul Jennings, De Villiers Smit, Peter Cameron, Biswadev Mitra

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa BrichkoFrom, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6486-4738
Ravali GaddamFrom, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Cristina RomanFrom, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-2338
Gerard O'ReillyFrom, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5763-917X
Carl LuckhoffFrom, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul JenningsSchool of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5605-7589
De Villiers SmitFrom, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-779X
Peter CameronFrom, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-557X
Biswadev MitraFrom, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-2450
National Trauma Research Institute · AUAlfred Health · AUAmbulance Victoria · AUCabrini Hospital · AUMonash Health · AUMonash Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of methoxyflurane versus standard care for the initial management of severe pain among adult emergency department (ED) patients.

methodsThis randomized parallel-group open-label phase IV trial of methoxyflurane was conducted in a tertiary hospital ED setting in Australia. Inclusion criteria required adult patients to have an initial pain score ≥ 8 on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment at ED triage. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving clinically substantial pain reduction, defined as a ≥50% drop in the pain score at 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes included the pain score at multiple time points (15, 30, 60, 90 minutes) and the difference in the proportion of patients achieving a >2-point reduction on the NRS.

resultsThere were 120 patients randomized and analyzed between September 4, 2019, and January 16, 2020. The primary outcome was achieved in six (10%) patients in the methoxyflurane arm and three (5%) in the standard care arm (p = 0.49). A higher proportion of patients in the methoxyflurane arm reported a >2-point drop on the NRS at all time points (17% vs. 5% at 15 minutes, 25% vs. 9% at 30 minutes, 30% vs. 10% at 60 minutes, and 33% vs. 13% at 90 minutes). Methoxyflurane use was also associated with lower median pain scores at all time points.

conclusionInitial management with inhaled methoxyflurane in the ED did not achieve the prespecified substantial reduction in pain, but was associated with clinically significant lower pain scores compared to standard therapy.

Indexed as

Acute PainAnesthetics, InhalationAdultAustraliaEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMethoxyfluranePain ManagementPain MeasurementReference StandardsTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, InhalationMethoxyflurane

Identifiers

PMID32989888
OpenAlexW3090599360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.