ArticleIndoor air2021
A new UVC-LED system for disinfection of pathogens generated by toilet flushing.
Article in Indoor air, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can a UV-C box help the cinema industry by disinfecting video cameras?Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- Development of a high-speed bioaerosol elimination system for treatment of indoor air.Building and environment · 2023Article
- Commercial toilets emit energetic and rapidly spreading aerosol plumes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Wavelength-Based Inactivation Effects of a Light-Emitting Diode Module on Indoor Microorganisms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of the UVC LEDs' Applications and Decontamination Capability.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new disinfection system utilizing UVC-LED irradiation was developed. The system was affixed to the toilet seat, and it was challenged by three bacteria strains. Different configurations were tested: 3-LEDs, 5-LEDs (two variants), and 8-LEDs. To determine the arrangement designs of LEDs with the optimum efficacy, two variants of 5-LEDs configurations were additionally considered-uniform and concentrated (2-sided) distributions. It was noticed that disinfection efficacy initially increased with the number of LEDs, but with 8-LEDs, the trend became almost non-obvious for surface disinfection and just marginally increased for airborne disinfection. The mean efficiencies for the surface disinfection ranged from 55.17 ± 23.89% to 72.80 ± 4.13% for E. coli; 36.65 ± 2.99% to 50.05 ± 13.38% for S. typhimurium; and 8.81 ± 3.23% to 39.43 ± 9.33% for S. epidermidis. Likewise, the mean efficiencies for airborne disinfection ranged from 42.17 ± 8.18% to 70.70 ± 4.80%; 40.40 ± 17.90% to 58.31 ± 13.87%; and 24.16 ± 3.81% to 42.79 ± 10.20% for E. coli; S. typhimurium; and S. epidermidis, respectively. Furthermore, the efficacy of the uniform irradiation was nearly twice that of the concentrated irradiation for surface disinfection and 17.70% higher for airborne disinfection, when tested against E coli. Collectively, these very promising results showcased that this compact, sustainable, and localized disinfection system has a high potential for the next generation of disinfection devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.