Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32989634›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2021

Emerging role of miRNAs as liquid biopsy markers for prediction of glioblastoma multiforme prognosis.

Menha Swellam, Noha M Bakr, Hekmat M El Magdoub, Marwa S Hamza, Lobna R Ezz El Arab

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Liquid biomarkers in glioma.Brain tumor pathology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Menha SwellamBiochemistry Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Dokki, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7104-7194
Noha M BakrBiochemistry Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Dokki, Egypt.
Hekmat M El MagdoubBiochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Translational Research Unit, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt. hekmat.magdoub@miuegypt.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5742-6713
Marwa S HamzaClinical Pharmacy Practice Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, The British University in Egypt, El-Sherouk City, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9710-150X
Lobna R Ezz El ArabClinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
National Research Centre · EGAin Shams University · EGBritish University in Egypt · EGMisr International University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum miRNAs (miRs) have gained consideration as encouraging molecular markers for cancer diagnosis and prediction of prognosis. The authors aimed to identify the exact role of miR-17-5p, miR-125b, and miR-221 among glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients before and after standard treatment, and correlate their expression with survival pattern. The study included 25 GBM patients and 20 healthy controls. Serum miR-17-5p, miR-125b, and miR-221 expression were analyzed before and after treatment using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The diagnostic efficacy for the tested miRs was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the relation of miRs expression versus clinical criteria for GBM was assessed. Patients' survival patterns were examined versus miRs expression levels. A significant difference was reported between miRs expression among the enrolled individuals. Both miR-17-5p and miR-221 reported significant elevations in GBM patients who: are above 60 years old, underwent biopsy resection, have a non-frontal lesion, with tumor size above 5 cm, and with performance status equals 2 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status. With regard to miR-125b, a significant difference was detected according to surgery strategy, primary lesion of the tumor, and ECOG status. MiRs levels were significantly decreased for GBM patients after treatment. Survival patterns demonstrated an increase in miR-17-5p, miR-125b, and miR-221 in GBM patients with worse progression-free survival and among those with worse overall survival. Detection of serum miR-17-5p, miR-125b, and miR-221 aids in the prediction of prognosis and response to treatment strategy for GBM patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCirculating MicroRNAFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNAGBMLiquid biopsymiR-125bmiR-17-5pmiR-221PredictionResponse

Identifiers

PMID32989634
OpenAlexW3090256149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.