Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32989548›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2021

Interim safety analysis of the first-in-human clinical trial of the Versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery.

Dhananjay Kelkar, Mahindra A Borse, Girish P Godbole, Utkrant Kurlekar, Mark Slack

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Robotic Appendicectomy: A review of feasibility.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Robotic surgery in emergency general surgery: an overview of UK practice.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dhananjay KelkarDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Mahindra A BorseDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Girish P GodboleDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Utkrant KurlekarDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Mark SlackCMR Surgical Ltd, 1 Evolution Business Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB24 9NG, UK. mark.slack@cmrsurgical.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-8118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to provide an interim safety analysis of the first 30 surgical procedures performed using the Versius Surgical System.

backgroundRobot-assisted laparoscopy has been developed to overcome some of the important limitations of conventional laparoscopy. The new system is currently undergoing a first-in-human prospective clinical trial to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the device when performing minimal access surgery (MAS).

methodsProcedures were performed using Versius by a lead surgeon supported by an operating room (OR) team. Male or female patients aged between 18 and 65 years old and requiring elective minor or intermediate gynaecological or general surgical procedures were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the rate of unplanned conversion of procedures to other MAS or open surgery.

resultsThe procedures included nine cholecystectomies, six robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies, four appendectomies, five diagnostic laparoscopy cases, two oophorectomies, two fallopian tube recanalisation procedures, an ovarian cystectomy and a salpingo-oophorectomy procedure. All procedures were completed successfully without the need for conversion to MAS or open surgery. No patient returned to the OR within 24 h of surgery and readmittance rate at 30 and 90 days post-surgery was 1/30 (3.3%) and 2/30 (6.7%), respectively.

conclusionsThis first-in-human interim safety analysis demonstrates that the Versius Surgical System is safe and can be used to successfully perform minor or intermediate gynaecological and general surgery procedures. The cases presented here provide evidence that the Versius clinical trial can continue to extend recruitment and begin to include major procedures, in alignment with the IDEAL-D Framework Stage 2b: Exploration.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansHysterectomyMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesYoung AdultCholecystectomyClinical trialGynaecologic surgical proceduresHysterectomyMinimally invasive surgical procedureRobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID32989548
PMCPMC8346419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.