ArticlePharmaceutical research2020
Variability of Skin Pharmacokinetic Data: Insights from a Topical Bioequivalence Study Using Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04592016 (A Single Center, Open-label, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Ability of Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single Center, Open-label, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Ability of Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion (dOFM) for Bioequivalence Testing of Topically Applied Diclofenac Sodium Products in Healthy Subjects
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tackling cutaneous herpes simplex virus disease with topical immunomodulators-a call to action.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Central Nervous System Medications: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations for Older Adults.Drugs & aging · 2024Review
- Comparative Study of Dermal Pharmacokinetics Between Topical Drugs Using Open Flow Microperfusion in a Pig Model.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Reverse Iontophoresis: Noninvasive Assessment of Topical Drug Bioavailability.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Bioequivalence Evaluation of Topical Metronidazole Products Using Dermal Microdialysis in New Zealand Rabbits.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Article
- Confocal Raman Spectroscopy for Assessing Bioequivalence of Topical Formulations.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Estimating the Analytical Performance of Raman Spectroscopy for Quantification of Active Ingredients in HumanMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dermal open flow microperfusion for PK-based clinical bioequivalence studies of topical drug products.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Micropore Closure Rates following Microneedle Application at Various Anatomical Sites in Healthy Human Subjects.Skin pharmacology and physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) has previously demonstrated its utility to assess the bioequivalence (BE) of topical drug products in a clinical study. We aimed to characterize the sources of variability in the dermal pharmacokinetic data from that study.
methodsExploratory statistical analyses were performed with multivariate data from a clinical dOFM-study in 20 healthy adults evaluating the BE, or lack thereof, of Austrian test (T) and U.S. reference (R) acyclovir cream, 5% products.
resultsThe overall variability of logAUC values (CV: 39% for R and 45% for T) was dominated by inter-subject variability (R: 82%, T: 91%) which correlated best with the subject's skin conductance. Intra-subject variability was 18% (R) and 9% (T) of the overall variability; skin treatment sites or methodological factors did not significantly contribute to that variability.
conclusionsInter-subject variability was the major component of overall variability for acyclovir, and treatment site location did not significantly influence intra-subject variability. These results support a dOFM BE study design with T and R products assessed simultaneously on the same subject, where T and R treatment sites do not necessarily need to be next to each other. Localized variation in skin microstructure may be primarily responsible for intra-subject variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.