ArticleNeurosurgical review2021
The safety and efficacy of low-dosage tirofiban for stent-assisted coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- The Prophylactic Use of Glycoprotein 2b/3a Inhibitors in the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World neurosurgery · 2022Pooled it
- Neuroform atlas versus LVIS-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Direct mechanical thrombectomy vs. intravenous alteplase plus mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation tandem occlusions.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Use of the Neuroform Atlas stent for wide-necked cerebral aneurysms.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Anticoagulation Options for Cranial Procedures: A Comparative Review of Aspirin, Plavix, and Aggrastat.Cureus · 2023Review
- Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Ruptured Aneurysms in the Acute Stage: Advantages and Disadvantages.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2023Article
- Intravenous cangrelor use for neuroendovascular procedures: a two-center experience and updated systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Utility of low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS™) stent for treatment of acutely ruptured bifurcation aneurysms: A single-center study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Ventriculostomy-related intracranial hemorrhage following surgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms.Neurosurgical review · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous tirofiban for stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A single center experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022Article
- Modified balloon-assisted coiling instead of acute stenting in the treatment of ruptured wide necked intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022Article
- Worldwide productivity and research trends of publications concerning stent application in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A bibliometric study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of acutely ruptured aneurysms with antiplatelet therapy has been controversial. Tirofiban has been used for the treatment of thromboembolism of ruptured aneurysms with a stent. However, there are few comparative studies of a reasonable dosage for the prophylactic use of tirofiban. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of reducing the dosage of tirofiban for the ruptured aneurysms with SAC. Patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms in our institution from January 2014 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Three hundred and nine patients were treated using SAC within 72 h of onset. Patients were divided into either a standard group (211 patients, 10 μg/kg intravenous bolus within 3 min, maintained with 0.15 μg/kg/min) or a half-dose group (98 patients, 5 μg/kg intravenous bolus within 3 min, maintained with 0.075 μg/kg/min) according to the dose of tirofiban received intraoperatively. Medical records including clinical and radiological details were reviewed. No significant differences in demographic information or aneurysm characteristics existed between the two groups. Thromboembolic complications were found in 15 patients (4.9%), including 11 patients (5.2%) in the standard group and four patients (4.1%) in the half-dose group, without significant difference (P = 0.782). Intracranial hemorrhage was found in 13 patients (4.2%), and all occurred in the standard group, which was significantly different (6.2% vs 0%, P = 0.011). Of these 13 patients, four were left disabled and five died. Except for three patients who had intraoperative aneurysm rupture, the incidence of postoperative early rebleeding (10 patients) was significantly different between the two groups (4.7% vs 0%, P = 0.034). The rate of initial complete occlusion in the half-dose group was significantly higher than that in the standard group (55.1% vs 39.8%). The rate of a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) was not significantly different between the standard group and half-dose group (78.7% vs 87.8%, P > 0.05). Intravenous tirofiban for SAC of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms is feasible and safe. The half-dose tirofiban treatment was associated with a decrease in the prevalence of intracranial hemorrhage but no increase in thromboembolic events compared with those in standard-dose tirofiban treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.