Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32989306›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2020

Tutorial: a computational framework for the design and optimization of peripheral neural interfaces.

Simone Romeni, Giacomo Valle, Alberto Mazzoni, Silvestro Micera

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation: Vagus et al.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. NRV: An open framework forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Simone RomeniThe Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0903-9441
Giacomo ValleThe Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-8007
Alberto MazzoniThe Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Silvestro MiceraThe Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy. silvestro.micera@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4396-8217
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral neural interfaces have been successfully used in the recent past to restore sensory-motor functions in disabled subjects and for the neuromodulation of the autonomic nervous system. The optimization of these neural interfaces is crucial for ethical, clinical and economic reasons. In particular, hybrid models (HMs) constitute an effective framework to simulate direct nerve stimulation and optimize virtually every aspect of implantable electrode design: the type of electrode (for example, intrafascicular versus extrafascicular), their insertion position and the used stimulation routines. They are based on the combined use of finite element methods (to calculate the voltage distribution inside the nerve due to the electrical stimulation) and computational frameworks such as NEURON ( https://neuron.yale.edu/neuron/ ) to determine the effects of the electric field generated on the neural structures. They have already provided useful results for different applications, but the overall usability of this powerful approach is still limited by the intrinsic complexity of the procedure. Here, we illustrate a general, modular and expandable framework for the application of HMs to peripheral neural interfaces, in which the correct degree of approximation required to answer different kinds of research questions can be readily determined and implemented. The HM workflow is divided into the following tasks: identify and characterize the fiber subpopulations inside the fascicles of a given nerve section, determine different degrees of approximation for fascicular geometries, locate the fibers inside these geometries and parametrize electrode geometries and the geometry of the nerve-electrode interface. These tasks are examined in turn, and solutions to the most relevant issues regarding their implementation are described. Finally, some examples related to the simulation of common peripheral neural interfaces are provided.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedHumansImplantable NeurostimulatorsPeripheral NervesProstheses and Implants

Identifiers

PMID32989306
OpenAlexW3091627004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.