Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32989270›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021

(Un)standardized testing: the diagnostic odyssey of children with rare genetic disorders in Alberta, Canada.

Christine Michaels-Igbokwe, Brenda McInnes, Karen V MacDonald, Gillian R Currie, Fadya Omar, Brittany Shewchuk, Francois P Bernier, Deborah A Marshall

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Is next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases worth its cost? A user-based approach to valuation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RDguru: An Intelligent Agent for Rare Diseases.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine Michaels-IgbokweCumming School of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. michaels-igbokwe@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0469-7055
Brenda McInnesDepartment of Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Karen V MacDonaldCumming School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Gillian R CurrieCumming School of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Fadya OmarDepartment of Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Brittany ShewchukCumming School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Francois P BernierDepartment of Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Deborah A MarshallCumming School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe provide a description of the diagnostic odyssey for a cohort of children seeking diagnosis of a rare genetic disorder in terms of the time from initial consultation to most recent visit or receipt of diagnosis, the number of tests per patient, and the types of tests received.

methodsRetrospective chart review of 299 children seen at the Alberta Children's Hospital (ACH) Genetics Clinic (GC) for whom the result of at least one single-gene test, gene panel, or chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) was recorded.

resultsOf 299 patients, 90 (30%) received a diagnosis in the period of the review. Patients had an average of 5.4 tests each; 236 (79%) patients received CMA; 172 (58%) patients received single-gene tests and 34 (11%) received gene panels; 167 (56%) underwent imaging/electrical activity studies. The mean observation period was 898 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 791, 1004). Among patients with visits recorded prior to visiting ACH GC, 43% of the total observation time occurred prior to the GC.

conclusionAs genomic technologies expand, the nature of the diagnostic odyssey will change. This study has outlined the current standard of care in the ACH GC, providing a baseline against which future changes can be assessed.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenomicsAlbertaChildHumansMicroarray AnalysisRetrospective Studieschildrendiagnostic odysseygenetic disorderspediatric

Identifiers

PMID32989270
OpenAlexW3089864083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.