Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32989249›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2020

Global hyperactivation of enhancers stabilizes human and mouse naive pluripotency through inhibition of CDK8/19 Mediator kinases.

Cian J Lynch, Raquel Bernad, Ana Martínez-Val, Marta N Shahbazi, Sandrina Nóbrega-Pereira, Isabel Calvo, Carmen Blanco-Aparicio, Carolina Tarantino, Elena Garreta, Laia Richart-Ginés and 21 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. UTERINE FIBROIDS.Physiological reviews · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cdk8 and Hira mutations trigger X chromosome elimination in naive female hybrid mouse embryonic stem cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Cian J LynchTumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Raquel BernadTumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Ana Martínez-ValProteoRed-ISCIII Proteomics Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Marta N ShahbaziMammalian Embryo and Stem Cell Group, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1599-5747
Sandrina Nóbrega-PereiraDepartment of Medical Sciences and Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9652-1382
Isabel CalvoTumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4107-296X
Carmen Blanco-AparicioExperimental Therapeutics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3249-6595
Carolina TarantinoPluripotency for Organ Regeneration, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Elena GarretaPluripotency for Organ Regeneration, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Laia Richart-GinésMaintenance of Transcriptional Repression by Polycomb Proteins, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Noelia AlcazarTumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Osvaldo Graña-CastroBioinformatics Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Gonzalo Gómez-LopezBioinformatics Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4146-0551
Irene AksoyStem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1, INSERM U1208, Bron, France.
Maribel Muñoz-MartínTumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Sonia MartinezExperimental Therapeutics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-7794
Sagrario OrtegaTransgenic Mice Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Susana PrietoIGMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Inserm, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9746-2396
Elisabeth SimboeckIGMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Inserm, Montpellier, France.
Alain CamassesIGMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Inserm, Montpellier, France.
Camille Stephan-Otto AttoliniBioinformatics-Biostatistics Unit, Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8045-320X
Agustin F FernandezCancer Epigenetics and Nanomedicine Laboratory, Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Research Center (CINN-CSIC), Institute of Oncology of Asturias (IUOPA), ISPA-Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3792-4085
Marta I SierraCancer Epigenetics and Nanomedicine Laboratory, Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Research Center (CINN-CSIC), Institute of Oncology of Asturias (IUOPA), ISPA-Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Mario F FragaCancer Epigenetics and Nanomedicine Laboratory, Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Research Center (CINN-CSIC), Institute of Oncology of Asturias (IUOPA), ISPA-Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Joaquin PastorExperimental Therapeutics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Daniel FisherIGMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Inserm, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0822-3482
Nuria MontserratPluripotency for Organ Regeneration, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Pierre SavatierStem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1, INSERM U1208, Bron, France.
Javier MuñozProteoRed-ISCIII Proteomics Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3288-3496
Magdalena Zernicka-GoetzMammalian Embryo and Stem Cell Group, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7004-2471
Manuel SerranoTumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain. manuel.serrano@irbbarcelona.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-9312
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversidad de Oviedo · ESBarcelona Institute of Science and Technology · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCalifornia Institute of Technology · USInstitut Curie · FRInstitute for Research in Biomedicine · ESMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098287/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) transition between cell states in vitro, reflecting developmental changes in the early embryo. PSCs can be stabilized in the naive state by blocking extracellular differentiation stimuli, particularly FGF-MEK signalling. Here, we report that multiple features of the naive state in human and mouse PSCs can be recapitulated without affecting FGF-MEK signalling or global DNA methylation. Mechanistically, chemical inhibition of CDK8 and CDK19 (hereafter CDK8/19) kinases removes their ability to repress the Mediator complex at enhancers. CDK8/19 inhibition therefore increases Mediator-driven recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) to promoters and enhancers. This efficiently stabilizes the naive transcriptional program and confers resistance to enhancer perturbation by BRD4 inhibition. Moreover, naive pluripotency during embryonic development coincides with a reduction in CDK8/19. We conclude that global hyperactivation of enhancers drives naive pluripotency, and this can be achieved in vitro by inhibiting CDK8/19 kinase activity. These principles may apply to other contexts of cellular plasticity.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationDNA MethylationEnhancer Elements, GeneticAnimalsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 8Cyclin-Dependent KinasesFemaleHumansMicePhosphorylationPluripotent Stem CellsPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA Polymerase IISignal TransductionCDK19 protein, humanCDK19 protein, mouseCyclin-Dependent Kinase 8Cyclin-Dependent KinasesRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID32989249
OpenAlexW3091753338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.