Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32989182›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2020

Clinical Evaluation of a Patient With Symptoms of Colonic or Anorectal Motility Disorders.

Bryan Curtin, Enoe Jimenez, Satish S C Rao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Is evaluation by questionnaires sufficient to cover all aspects of bowel symptoms in rectal cancer patients after low anterior resection?Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bryan CurtinDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Enoe JimenezDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Satish S C RaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.

Funding

Fecal Incontinence Treatment Study (FIT Study)U01DK115575 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E. · 2018 to 2023
$10.0M
TRANSLUMBOSACRAL NEUROMODULATION THERAPY FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE: RANDOMIZED TRIALR01DK121003 · NIDDK · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI KUO, BRADEN, RAO, SATISH SC · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121003NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK115575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, fecal incontinence, abdominal pain, and anorectal pain are problems that affect 40% of the population. They commonly present with overlapping symptoms indicating that their pathophysiology affects multiple segments of the gut as well as brain and gut interactions. Clinically, although some conditions are readily recognized, dyssynergic defecation, fecal incontinence, and anorectal pain are often missed or misdiagnosed. Consequently, the assessment of lower gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with suspected colonic or anorectal motility disorder(s) remains challenging for most clinicians. A detailed history, use of the Bristol stool form scale, prospective stool diaries, ideally through a phone App, digital rectal examination, and judicious use of complementary diagnostic tests are essential. Additionally, it is important to evaluate the impact of these problems on quality of life and psychosocial issues, because they are intricately linked with these disorders. The Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for functional gastrointestinal disorders can provide additional information often missed during history taking. Here, we discuss a systematic approach for the clinical evaluation of patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal problems, grouped under 4 common diagnostic categories. We describe how to take a detailed history, perform meticulous digital rectal examination, and use validated tools to supplement clinical evaluation, including assessments of quality of life and scoring systems for disease severity and digital Apps. These tools could facilitate a comprehensive plan for clinical management including diagnostic tests, and translate the patients' complaints into definable, diagnostic categories.

Indexed as

Anorectal painConstipationDiagnostic testsFecal incontinenceIrritable bowel syndromeroutine

Identifiers

PMID32989182
PMCPMC7547199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.