Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32988418›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2020

Accelerated long-term forgetting in healthy older adults predicts cognitive decline over 1 year.

Alfie R Wearn, Esther Saunders-Jennings, Volkan Nurdal, Emma Hadley, Michael J Knight, Margaret Newson, Risto A Kauppinen, Elizabeth J Coulthard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-term forgetting, sleep, and tau in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Memory Sins in Applied Settings: What Kind of Progress?Journal of applied research in memory and cognition · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alfie R WearnBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Alfie.wearn@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7699-648X
Esther Saunders-JenningsBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Volkan NurdalBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Emma HadleyBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Michael J KnightSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Margaret NewsonInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Risto A KauppinenDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Elizabeth J CoulthardBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 109067/Z/15/AI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHere, we address a pivotal factor in Alzheimer's prevention-identifying those at risk early, when dementia can still be avoided. Recent research highlights an accelerated forgetting phenotype as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. We hypothesized that delayed recall over 4 weeks would predict cognitive decline over 1 year better than 30-min delayed recall, the current gold standard for detecting episodic memory problems which could be an early clinical manifestation of incipient Alzheimer's disease. We also expected hippocampal subfield volumes to improve predictive accuracy.

methodsForty-six cognitively healthy older people (mean age 70.7 ± 7.97, 21/46 female), recruited from databases such as Join Dementia Research, or a local database of volunteers, performed 3 memory tasks on which delayed recall was tested after 30 min and 4 weeks, as well as Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) and CANTAB Paired Associates Learning. Medial temporal lobe subregion volumes were automatically measured using high-resolution 3T MRI. The ACE-III was repeated after 12 months to assess the change in cognitive ability. We used univariate linear regressions and ROC curves to assess the ability of tests of delayed recall to predict cognitive decline on ACE-III over the 12 months.

resultsFifteen of the 46 participants declined over the year (≥ 3 points lost on ACE-III). Four-week verbal memory predicted cognitive decline in healthy older people better than clinical gold standard memory tests and hippocampal MRI. The best single-test predictor of cognitive decline was the 4-week delayed recall on the world list (R

conclusionsWe show that a test of accelerated long-term forgetting over 4 weeks can predict cognitive decline in healthy older people where traditional tests of delayed recall cannot. Accelerated long-term forgetting is a sensitive, easy-to-test predictor of cognitive decline in healthy older people. Used alone or with hippocampal MRI, accelerated forgetting probes functionally relevant Alzheimer's-related change. Accelerated forgetting will identify early-stage impairment, helping to target more invasive and expensive molecular biomarker testing.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedFemaleHumansMemory DisordersMental RecallMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsAlzheimer’s diseaseEarly diagnosisHippocampusLong-term memoryMedial temporal lobeMRI

Identifiers

PMID32988418
PMCPMC7523317
OpenAlexW3088284226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.