Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32988400›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2020

Comorbidity between depression and anxiety: assessing the role of bridge mental states in dynamic psychological networks.

Robin N Groen, Oisín Ryan, Johanna T W Wigman, Harriëtte Riese, Brenda W J H Penninx, Erik J Giltay, Marieke Wichers, Catharina A Hartman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Illness Perceptions in Psychiatric Disorders: Assessing Differences and Associations With Symptom Severity.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robin N GroenDepartment of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands. r.n.groen@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2863-6030
Oisín RyanDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johanna T W WigmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Harriëtte RieseDepartment of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Brenda W J H PenninxDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit and GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Erik J GiltayDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marieke WichersDepartment of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Catharina A HartmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLGGZ inGeest · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Horizon 2020 681466Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 016.156.019Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 406-15-128Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 406.16.507ZonMw 10-000-1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComorbidity between depressive and anxiety disorders is common. A hypothesis of the network perspective on psychopathology is that comorbidity arises due to the interplay of symptoms shared by both disorders, with overlapping symptoms acting as so-called bridges, funneling symptom activation between symptom clusters of each disorder. This study investigated this hypothesis by testing whether (i) two overlapping mental states "worrying" and "feeling irritated" functioned as bridges in dynamic mental state networks of individuals with both depression and anxiety as compared to individuals with either disorder alone, and (ii) overlapping or non-overlapping mental states functioned as stronger bridges.

methodsData come from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). A total of 143 participants met criteria for comorbid depression and anxiety (65%), 40 participants for depression-only (18.2%), and 37 for anxiety-only (16.8%) during any NESDA wave. Participants completed momentary assessments of symptoms (i.e., mental states) of depression and anxiety, five times a day, for 2 weeks (14,185 assessments). First, dynamics between mental states were modeled with a multilevel vector autoregressive model, using Bayesian estimation. Summed average lagged indirect effects through the hypothesized bridge mental states were compared between groups. Second, we evaluated the role of all mental states as potential bridge mental states.

resultsWhile the summed indirect effect for the bridge mental state "worrying" was larger in the comorbid group compared to the single disorder groups, differences between groups were not statistically significant. The difference between groups became more pronounced when only examining individuals with recent diagnoses (< 6 months). However, the credible intervals of the difference scores remained wide. In the second analysis, a non-overlapping item ("feeling down") acted as the strongest bridge mental state in both the comorbid and anxiety-only groups.

conclusionsThis study empirically examined a prominent network-approach hypothesis for the first time using longitudinal data. No support was found for overlapping mental states "worrying" and "feeling irritable" functioning as bridge mental states in individuals vulnerable for comorbid depression and anxiety. Potentially, bridge mental state activity can only be observed during acute symptomatology. If so, these may present as interesting targets in treatment, but not prevention. This requires further investigation.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnxietyBridge symptomsComorbidityDepressionEcological momentary assessmentIntensive longitudinal dataNetwork analysisTime series

Identifiers

PMID32988400
PMCPMC7523307
OpenAlexW3091627031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.