Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32988368›Full record

Observational studyBMC gastroenterology2020

Duodenal major papilla morphology can affect biliary cannulation and complications during ERCP, an observational study.

Po-Han Chen, Chun-Fang Tung, Yen-Chung Peng, Hong-Zen Yeh, Chi-Sen Chang, Chia-Chang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Po-Han ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.
Chun-Fang TungDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.
Yen-Chung PengDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.
Hong-Zen YehDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.
Chi-Sen ChangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.
Chia-Chang ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan. judgespear@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4407-2052
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated whether duodenal major papilla morphology could be a risk factor for failure of selective biliary cannulation (SBC) and post endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and pancreatography (ERCP) complications.

methodsA prospectively recorded database was reviewed retrospectively. Patients were included if they received therapeutic ERCP and had naïve major duodenal papilla. We used Haraldsson's classification for papilla morphology, as follows: Regular (Type 1), Small (Type 2), Protruding or Pendulous (Type 3) and Creased or Ridged (Type 4). Risk factors for failing SBC and post-ERCP complications were analyzed by multivariate analysis.

resultsA total of 286 cases were included. Age, gender, indications and therapeutic procedures were not different among the four types of papillae. The failure rates of SBC with Type 3 papilla and Type 4 papilla were 11.11% and 6.25%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, Type 2 papilla (odd ratio 7.18, p = 0.045) and Type 3 papilla (odd ratio 7.44, p = 0.016) were associated with greater SBC failure compared with Type 1 papilla. Malignant obstruction compared to stone (odds ratio 4.45, p = 0.014) and age (odd ratio = 1.06, p = 0.010) were also risk factors for cannulation failure. Type 2 papilla was correlated with a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (20%, p = 0.020) compared to the other types of papilla However, papilla morphology was not a significant risk factor for any complications in the multivariate analysis.

conclusionSmall papilla and protruding or pendulous papilla are more difficult to cannulate compared to regular papilla. Small papilla is associated with a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Ampulla of VaterPancreatitisCatheterizationCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansRetrospective StudiesSphincterotomy, EndoscopicBiliary tract surgical proceduresEndoscopic biliary SphincterotomyEndoscopy, gastrointestinalERCPGreater duodenal papilla

Identifiers

PMID32988368
PMCPMC7520951
OpenAlexW3091607417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.