Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32988243›Full record

ArticleHuman factors2022

Postural Control When Using an Industrial Lower Limb Exoskeleton: Impact of Reaching for a Working Tool and External Perturbation.

Benjamin Steinhilber, Robert Seibt, Monika A Rieger, Tessy Luger

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06995469 (Efficacy of a Passive Lower Limb Exoskeleton on Plantar Pressure Distribution to Reduce on Plantar Pressure Distribution to Reduce Prolonged Standing Injuries), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06995469 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a Passive Lower Limb Exoskeleton on Plantar Pressure Distribution to Reduce on Plantar Pressure Distribution to Reduce Prolonged Standing Injuries: Prolonged Standing Injuries

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente MártirRan2025 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsHealth-Related BehaviorArmsChairless Chair® 2.0 Passive Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in Robotics Research in Occupational Safety and Health: A Scientometric Analysis and Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  7. Guidelines for Working Heights of the Lower-Limb Exoskeleton (CEX) Based on Ergonomic Evaluations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin Steinhilber9188 University of Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9622-6511
Robert Seibt9188 University of Tübingen, Germany.
Monika A Rieger9188 University of Tübingen, Germany.
Tessy Luger9188 University of Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5718-251X
University of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate postural control related to a lower limb exoskeleton (Chairless Chair) when (a) reaching for a working tool, and (b) an external perturbation occurs.

backgroundLower limb exoskeletons aiming to reduce physical load associated with prolonged standing may impair workers' postural control and increase the risk of falling.

methodForty-five males were reaching for an object (3-kg dumbbell) at the lateral end of their reaching area without the exoskeleton in upright standing (STAND) and with the exoskeleton at a high (EXO

resultsSS

conclusionImpairments in postural control by the exoskeleton may not be relevant when reaching laterally for objects up to 3 kg. When an external perturbation occurs, the risk of falling may be much higher; irrespective of factors like uneven or slippery flooring. APPLICATION: The risk of falling using the exoskeleton seems to be low when reaching laterally for an object of up to 3 kg. In situations where, for example, a collision with coworkers is likely, this exoskeleton is not recommended.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansLower ExtremityMalePostural BalanceStanding Positionassistive devicecenter of pressureexoskeletonoccupational safetyrisk of falling

Identifiers

PMID32988243
PMCPMC9136386
OpenAlexW3090637948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.