Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32987946›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

A New Era of Antibiotics: The Clinical Potential of Antimicrobial Peptides.

Katrina Browne, Sudip Chakraborty, Renxun Chen, Mark Dp Willcox, David StClair Black, William R Walsh, Naresh Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 231 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
34.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 464 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katrina BrowneSchool of Chemistry, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8141-0092
Sudip ChakrabortySchool of Chemistry, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Renxun ChenSchool of Chemistry, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0828-9980
Mark Dp WillcoxSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3842-7563
David StClair BlackSchool of Chemistry, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9300-4737
William R WalshSurgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, Prince of Wales Hospital, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Randwick 2031, Australia.
Naresh KumarSchool of Chemistry, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP180100845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a multifaceted crisis, imposing a serious threat to global health. The traditional antibiotic pipeline has been exhausted, prompting research into alternate antimicrobial strategies. Inspired by nature, antimicrobial peptides are rapidly gaining attention for their clinical potential as they present distinct advantages over traditional antibiotics. Antimicrobial peptides are found in all forms of life and demonstrate a pivotal role in the innate immune system. Many antimicrobial peptides are evolutionarily conserved, with limited propensity for resistance. Additionally, chemical modifications to the peptide backbone can be used to improve biological activity and stability and reduce toxicity. This review details the therapeutic potential of peptide-based antimicrobials, as well as the challenges needed to overcome in order for clinical translation. We explore the proposed mechanisms of activity, design of synthetic biomimics, and how this novel class of antimicrobial compound may address the need for effective antibiotics. Finally, we discuss commercially available peptide-based antimicrobials and antimicrobial peptides in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug DesignPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsPore Forming Cytotoxic Proteinsantibiotic-resistanceantimicrobial activityantimicrobial peptidescationic peptidesclinical translationpeptide-based therapies

Identifiers

PMID32987946
PMCPMC7582481
OpenAlexW3088313863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.