ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Hybrid Memetic Algorithm for the Node Location Problem in Local Positioning Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of range based self-localization problem in wireless sensor networks using improved cuckoo search algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sensor Placement in an Irregular 3D Surface for Improving Localization Accuracy Using a Multi-Objective Memetic Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Quantum Annealing Bat Algorithm for Node Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genetic Algorithm to Solve Optimal Sensor Placement for Underwater Vehicle Localization with Range Dependent Noises.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Memetic Chains for Improving the Local Wireless Sensor Networks Localization in Urban Scenarios.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Local Positioning Systems (LPS) have shown excellent performance for applications that demand high accuracy. They rely on ad-hoc node deployments which fit the environment characteristics in order to reduce the system uncertainties. The obtainment of competitive results through these systems requires the solution of the Node Location Problem (finding the optimal cartesian coordinates of the architecture sensors). This problem has been assigned as NP-Hard, therefore a heuristic solution is recommended for addressing this complex problem. Genetic Algorithms (GA) have shown an excellent trade-off between diversification and intensification in the literature. However, in Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) environments in which there is not continuity in the fitness function evaluation of a particular node distribution among contiguous solutions, challenges arise for the GA during the exploration of new potential regions of the space of solutions. Consequently, in this paper, we first propose a Hybrid GA with a combination of the GA operators in the evolutionary process for the Node Location Problem. Later, we introduce a Memetic Algorithm (MA) with a Local Search (LS) strategy for exploring the most different individuals of the population in search of improving the previous results. Finally, we combine the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (HGA) and Memetic Algorithm (MA), designing an enhanced novel methodology for solving the Node Location Problem, a Hybrid Memetic Algorithm (HMA). Results show that the HMA proposed in this article outperforms all of the individual configurations presented and attains an improvement of 14.2% in accuracy for the Node Location Problem solution in the scenario of simulations with regards to the previous GA optimizations of the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.