Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32987838›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Prognostic Value of the Pace of Tumor Progression as Assessed by Serial

Silvia Camera, Tugba Akin Telli, Erwin Woff, Caroline Vandeputte, Pashalina Kehagias, Thomas Guiot, Gabriela Critchi, Yacine Wissam, Giacomo Bregni, Elena Trevisi and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and Validation of anJCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Dynamic liquid biopsy components as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvia CameraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Tugba Akin TelliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Erwin WoffDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Caroline VandeputteGUTS lab, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Pashalina KehagiasGUTS lab, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Thomas GuiotDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Gabriela CritchiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Yacine WissamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Giacomo BregniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Elena TrevisiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1684-6740
Andrea PrettaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0262-9270
Chiara SentiGUTS lab, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Sophia LeducGUTS lab, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Paraskevas GkolfakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Frédéric HoernerClinical Trial Conduct Unit (CTCU), Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Françoise RothéBreast cancer translational research laboratory, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Francesco SclafaniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Patrick FlamenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Amelie DeleporteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Alain HendliszDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

undefined <span style="color:gray;font-size:10px;">undefined</span> not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDecision making in refractory colorectal cancer (rCRC) is challenging, with limited data available to predict patient outcome. We conducted a study to assess the pace of cancer progression as a potential prognostic and decision tool.

methodsCORIOLAN was a prospective, single-center, single-arm trial recruiting refractory CRC patients with an ECOG performance status of ≤1 and an estimated life expectancy of ≥12 weeks. 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (

results47 eligible patients who had received a median number of 5 (range 2-8) prior treatments were enrolled. At the time of analysis, 45 deaths had occurred, with 26% of patients dying within 12 weeks. The median OS was 6.3 months (range 0.4-14.3). The median relative delta between WB-MATV at baseline and 2 weeks was +21%. Changes of WB-MATV, however, failed to predict OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.3,

conclusionsIn this study, approximately 1 out of 4 refractory CRC patients who were judged to have a life expectancy >12 weeks actually died within 12 weeks. Baseline assessment of WB-MATV, cfDNA, CTCs and CEA, but not early change evaluation of the same, may help to refine patient prognostication and guide management decisions.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellscirculating tumor DNAcolorectal cancerpace of progressionwhole-body metabolically active tumor volume

Identifiers

PMID32987838
PMCPMC7601470
OpenAlexW3089077393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.