ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
8p11.23 Amplification in Breast Cancer: Molecular Characteristics, Prognosis and Targeted Therapy.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- FGFR as a Predictive Marker for Targeted Therapy in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Brain FGF2 and NCAM1 contribute to FGFR1-dependent progression of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer brain metastases.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Biomarkers of primary and secondary resistance to cyclin dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Review
- NSD Family-Mediated H3K36 Methylation in Human Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Target sequence of single cells captured by a polymeric microfluidic device.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review on targeted therapies for triple negative breast cancer: an evidence-based treatment guideline.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- NSD3 in Cancer: Unraveling Methyltransferase-Dependent and Isoform-Specific Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A signature of five 7-methylguanosine-related genes is a prognostic marker for lung squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- New Biomarkers and Treatment Advances in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Spontaneous Transformation of a p53 and Rb-Defective Human Fallopian Tube Epithelial Cell Line after Long Passage with Features of High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Mining the prognostic significance and immune infiltration ofGland surgery · 2022Article
- ZNF703 promotes triple-negative breast cancer cells through cell-cycle signaling and associated with poor prognosis.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Fibroblast growth factor receptor signalling dysregulation and targeting in breast cancer.Open biology · 2022Review
- The Role of Copy Number Variants in Gene Co-Expression Patterns for Luminal B Breast Tumors.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Rearrangement-mediated cis-regulatory alterations in advanced patient tumors reveal interactions with therapy.Cell reports · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmplification of the locus 8p11.23 has been observed in cancer and genes of this locus, including ZNF703 (Zinc finger protein 703), NSD3 (Nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3) and FGFR1 (Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1), have been put forward as dominant oncogenes conferring pathophysiologic benefit in cancers with amplifications. However, there is no consensus on the importance of each of them or any other genes of the amplicon or even a consensus on which genes are part of the amplicon.
methodsPublicly available data were used to characterize the locus amplified at 8p11.23 and derive information on each of the genes and roles as oncogenes. The frequency of the amplifications in the locus was examined in the cBioportal platform, and expression levels of the amplicon genes in amplified cases were derived from genomic studies reported in the platform. Examination of the influence of mRNA expressions of each gene of the locus for Recurrence-free survival in breast cancer was performed using K-M plotter.
resultsThe 8p11.23 amplicon is present in higher frequency in squamous cell lung carcinomas, breast cancers and bladder carcinomas and is only rarely observed in other cancers. The most frequently amplified genes within the amplicon vary between different types of cancers. In breast cancer, amplified cases are most commonly of the luminal B type. Amplified genes are not always over-expressed and there is a low correlation of amplification with over-expression in amplicon genes with variation between genes. The presence of the amplicon does not influence the aneuploidy score or the tumor mutation burden of breast cancers. Regarding prognosis, the two genes of the amplicon whose mRNA hyper-expression portends adverse relapse-free survival in breast cancer are EIF4EBP1 (Eukaryotic transcription initiation factor 4E binding protein 1) and LSM1 (LSM1 homolog, mRNA degradation associated).
conclusionBesides the previously proposed genes to play a role as dominant oncogenes in the 8p11.23 cancer amplified locus, other genes may also be important in breast cancer based on the high correlation of their amplification and mRNA expression and adverse prognosis conferred by over-expression, consistent with an oncogenic role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.