Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32987788›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Phytate Degradation, Transcellular Mineral Transporters, and Mineral Utilization by Two Strains of Laying Hens as Affected by Dietary Phosphorus and Calcium.

Vera Sommerfeld, Adewunmi Omolade Omotoso, Michael Oster, Henry Reyer, Amélia Camarinha-Silva, Martin Hasselmann, Korinna Huber, Siriluck Ponsuksili, Jana Seifert, Volker Stefanski and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vera SommerfeldInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7832-9656
Adewunmi Omolade OmotosoInstitute for Genome Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.
Michael OsterInstitute for Genome Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6835-7562
Henry ReyerInstitute for Genome Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-0434
Amélia Camarinha-SilvaInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7814-6569
Martin HasselmannInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3305-4024
Korinna HuberInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Siriluck PonsuksiliInstitute for Genome Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4714-1057
Jana SeifertInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7690-8539
Volker StefanskiInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Klaus WimmersInstitute for Genome Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9523-6790
Markus RodehutscordInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3156-7889
University of Hohenheim · DEResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RO 1217/10-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WI 1754/16-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laying hens require less phosphorus (P) but markedly more calcium (Ca) in their diet than broilers. These differences may cause more distinct interactions with phytate degradation and utilization of minerals in laying hens than those in broilers. The objective of the study was to characterize intestinal phytate degradation, ileal transcript copy numbers of transcellular Ca and P transporters, and mineral utilization by two laying hen strains fed with standard or reduced levels of dietary Ca and P at the laying peak. The strains showed differences regarding several traits driving Ca and P metabolism along the digestive tract. Thus, the two strains may use different mechanisms to meet their respective P demand, i.e., via effective phytate degradation and transcellular transport. Clear effects of the Ca level on

Indexed as

calciumlaying henmyo-inositolphosphorusphytate degradationtranscellular mineral transporttranscriptional responses

Identifiers

PMID32987788
PMCPMC7598718
OpenAlexW3087811765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.