Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32987766›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Natural Variation in Plant Pluripotency and Regeneration.

Robin Lardon, Danny Geelen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Unraveling Epigenetic Changes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. An ImprovedFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  16. Molecular Determinants ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin LardonDepartment of Plants and Crops, Horticell, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3735-2723
Danny GeelenDepartment of Plants and Crops, Horticell, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8105-3937
Ghent University · BE

Funding

Fonds voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek FWO 3G094619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant regeneration is essential for survival upon wounding and is, hence, considered to be a strong natural selective trait. The capacity of plant tissues to regenerate in vitro, however, varies substantially between and within species and depends on the applied incubation conditions. Insight into the genetic factors underlying this variation may help to improve numerous biotechnological applications that exploit in vitro regeneration. Here, we review the state of the art on the molecular framework of de novo shoot organogenesis from root explants in

Indexed as

callus formationde novo organogenesisepigeneticsmappingnatural variationplant regenerationpluripotencyquantitative trait locitissue culture

Identifiers

PMID32987766
PMCPMC7598583
OpenAlexW3088572584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.