Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32987707›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Uninterrupted or Minimally Interrupted Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy is a Safe Alternative to Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Máté Ottóffy, Péter Mátrai, Nelli Farkas, Péter Hegyi, László Czopf, Katalin Márta, András Garami, Márta Balaskó, Emőke Pótóné-Oláh, Alexandra Mikó and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Máté OttóffyFirst Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Péter MátraiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Nelli FarkasInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
László CzopfFirst Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Katalin MártaInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2213-4865
András GaramiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2493-0571
Márta BalaskóInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Emőke Pótóné-OláhInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Alexandra MikóInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Ildikó RostásInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Bastian WobbeFirst Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Tamás HabonFirst Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4816-857X
University of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate anticoagulation during catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial for the prevention of both thromboembolic events and life-threatening bleeding. The purpose of this updated meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted and minimally interrupted periprocedural direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) protocols and uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy in patients undergoing CA for AF based on the latest evidence. Randomized controlled trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective registries comparing DOACs to VKAs were identified in multiple databases (Embase, MEDLINE via PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus). The primary outcomes were stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, and net clinical benefit. Forty-two studies with a total of 22,715 patients were included in the final analysis. The occurrence of major bleeding was significantly lower in patients assigned to uninterrupted DOAC treatment compared to VKAs (pooled odds ratio (POR): 0.71, confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.99). The pooled analysis of both uninterrupted and minimally interrupted DOAC groups also showed significant reduction in major bleeding events (POR: 0.70, CI: 0.53-0.93). The incidence of thromboembolic events was low, with no significant difference between groups. This updated meta-analysis showed that DOAC therapy is as effective as VKA in preventing stroke and TIA. Minimally interrupted DOAC therapy is a non-inferior periprocedural anticoagulation strategy; however, uninterrupted DOAC therapy showed superiority compared to VKA with regard to major, life-threatening bleeding. Based on our in-depth analysis, we conclude that both DOAC strategies are equally safe and preferable alternatives to VKAs in patients undergoing CA for AF.

Indexed as

anticoagulationatrial fibrillationbleedingcatheter ablationmeta-analysisstroke

Identifiers

PMID32987707
PMCPMC7598585
OpenAlexW3088786135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.