Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32987299›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Unsupervised machine learning reveals lesional variability in focal cortical dysplasia at mesoscopic scale.

Hyo M Lee, Ravnoor S Gill, Fatemeh Fadaie, Kyoo H Cho, Marie C Guiot, Seok-Jun Hong, Neda Bernasconi, Andrea Bernasconi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Recent Advances in Neuroimaging of Epilepsy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyo M LeeNeuroimaging of Epilepsy Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ravnoor S GillNeuroimaging of Epilepsy Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Fatemeh FadaieNeuroimaging of Epilepsy Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kyoo H ChoDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Marie C GuiotDepartment of Pathology, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Seok-Jun HongNeuroimaging of Epilepsy Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Neda BernasconiNeuroimaging of Epilepsy Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Andrea BernasconiNeuroimaging of Epilepsy Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: andrea.bernasconi@mcgill.ca.
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAMcGill University · CAYonsei University · KR

Funding

CIHR MOP-123520CIHR MOP-57840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFocal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is the most common epileptogenic developmental malformation and a prevalent cause of surgically amenable epilepsy. While cellular and molecular biology data suggest that FCD lesional characteristics lie along a spectrum, this notion remains to be verified in vivo. We tested the hypothesis that machine learning applied to MRI captures FCD lesional variability at a mesoscopic scale.

methodsWe studied 46 patients with histologically verified FCD Type II and 35 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We applied consensus clustering, an unsupervised learning technique that identifies stable clusters based on bootstrap-aggregation, to 3 T multicontrast MRI (T1-weighted MRI and FLAIR) features of FCD normalized with respect to distributions in controls.

resultsLesions were parcellated into four classes with distinct structural profiles variably expressed within and across patients: Class-1 with isolated white matter (WM) damage; Class-2 combining grey matter (GM) and WM alterations; Class-3 with isolated GM damage; Class-4 with GM-WM interface anomalies. Class membership was replicated in two independent datasets. Classes with GM anomalies impacted local function (resting-state fMRI derived ALFF), while those with abnormal WM affected large-scale connectivity (assessed by degree centrality). Overall, MRI classes reflected typical histopathological FCD characteristics: Class-1 was associated with severe WM gliosis and interface blurring, Class-2 with severe GM dyslamination and moderate WM gliosis, Class-3 with moderate GM gliosis, Class-4 with mild interface blurring. A detection algorithm trained on class-informed data outperformed a class-naïve paradigm. SIGNIFICANCE: Machine learning applied to widely available MRI contrasts uncovers FCD Type II variability at a mesoscopic scale and identifies tissue classes with distinct structural dimensions, functional and histopathological profiles. Integrating in vivo staging of FCD traits with automated lesion detection is likely to inform the development of novel personalized treatments.

Indexed as

EpilepsyMalformations of Cortical DevelopmentMalformations of Cortical Development, Group IHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUnsupervised Machine LearningCortical dysplasiaEpilepsyMRI

Identifiers

PMID32987299
PMCPMC7520429
OpenAlexW3087383941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.