ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2020
Does expression of a human complement-regulatory protein on xenograft cells protect them from systemic complement activation?
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Research prospects for kidney xenotransplantation: a bibliometric analysis.Renal failure · 2024Article
- The Evolution of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Pig-to-Nonhuman Primate Organ Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Review
- Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Interact and Support Islet of Langerhans Viability and Function.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are many causes of systemic complement activation, which may have detrimental effects on a pig xenograft. Transgenic expression of one or more human complement-regulatory proteins (hCRPs), e.g., hCD46, provides some protection to the xenograft, but it is not known whether it protects the xenograft from the effects of systemic complement activation. We used wild-type (WT) pig aortic endothelial cells (pAECs) to activate complement, and determined whether the expression of hCD46 on a1,3galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) pAECs protected them from injury.
methodsCFSE-labeled and non-labeled pAECs from a WT, a GTKO, or a GTKO/hCD46 pig were separately incubated with heat-inactivated pooled human serum in vitro. Antibody pre-bonded CFSE-labeled and non-labeled pAECs were mixed, and then incubated with rabbit complement. The complement-dependent cytotoxicity was measured by flow cytometry.
resultsThere was significantly less lysis of GTKO/CD46 pAECs (6%) by 50% human serum compared to that of WT (91%, p<0.001) or GTKO (32%, p<0.01) pAECs. The lysis of GTKO pAECs was significantly increased when mixed with WT pAECs (p<0.05). In contrast, there was no significant change in cytotoxicity of GTKO/CD46 pAECs when mixed with WT pAECs.
conclusionsThe expression of hCD46 protected pAECs from systemic complement activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.