ArticleCellular immunology2020
CD4
Article in Cellular immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chimeric allergen receptor regulatory T cells suppress birch pollen allergic airway inflammation.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2026Article
- FOXP3 Stability-Adaptation Paradox: Reshaping Treg-Based Therapies for Intestinal Diseases.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor technology: an emerging translational immunotherapy in nonneoplastic diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- 3-in-oneiScience · 2025Article
- The curious case of AAV immunology.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Diverse potential of chimeric antigen receptor-engineered cell therapy: Beyond cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Advances in engineered T cell immunotherapy for autoimmune and other non-oncological diseases.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for autoimmune disease.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024Review
- Mini-Review: Tregs as a Tool for Therapy-Obvious and Non-Obvious Challenges and Solutions.Cells · 2024Review
- Role of FoxP3Human gene therapy · 2024Review
- CAR immunotherapy in autoimmune diseases: promises and challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Review
- New cell sources for CAR-based immunotherapy.Biomarker research · 2023Review
- Immunogenicity of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Vectors for Gene Transfer.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023Review
- CARs: a new approach for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Review
- Hydrodynamic Delivery: Characteristics, Applications, and Technological Advances.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Review
- Unlocking the potential of Tregs: innovations in CAR technology.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Multipurposing CARs: Same engine, different vehicles.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although protein replacement therapy provides effective treatment for hemophilia A patients, about a third of severe patients develop neutralizing inhibitor antibodies to factor VIII. Adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells (Tregs) has shown promise in treating unwanted immune responses. In previous studies, transferred polyclonal Tregs ameliorated the anti-factor VIII immune responses in hemophilia A mice. In addition, factor VIII-primed Tregs demonstrated increased suppressive function. However, antigen-specific Tregs are a small fraction of the total lymphocyte population. To generate large numbers of factor VIII-specific Tregs, the more abundant murine primary CD4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.