Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986833›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Contrasting Gene Decay in Subterranean Vertebrates: Insights from Cavefishes and Fossorial Mammals.

Maxime Policarpo, Julien Fumey, Philippe Lafargeas, Delphine Naquin, Claude Thermes, Magali Naville, Corentin Dechaud, Jean-Nicolas Volff, Cedric Cabau, Christophe Klopp and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Loss, persistence and reversal of phenotypic traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gene loss and relaxed selection ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gene loss and relaxed selection ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Maxime PolicarpoCNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Julien FumeyCNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Philippe LafargeasCNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Delphine NaquinUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Claude ThermesUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Magali NavilleInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Corentin DechaudInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Jean-Nicolas VolffInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Cedric CabauSIGENAE, GenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet Tolosan, France.
Christophe KloppINRAE, SIGENAE, Genotoul Bioinfo, MIAT UR875, Castanet Tolosan, France.
Peter Rask MøllerNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Louis BernatchezDepartment of Biology, Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Erik García-MachadoDepartment of Biology, Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Sylvie RétauxCNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Didier CasaneCNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRÉvolution, Génomes, Comportement, Écologie · FRInstitut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Laval · CAUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Havana · CU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution sometimes proceeds by loss, especially when structures and genes become dispensable after an environmental shift relaxes functional constraints. Subterranean vertebrates are outstanding models to analyze this process, and gene decay can serve as a readout. We sought to understand some general principles on the extent and tempo of the decay of genes involved in vision, circadian clock, and pigmentation in cavefishes. The analysis of the genomes of two Cuban species belonging to the genus Lucifuga provided evidence for the largest loss of eye-specific genes and nonvisual opsin genes reported so far in cavefishes. Comparisons with a recently evolved cave population of Astyanax mexicanus and three species belonging to the Chinese tetraploid genus Sinocyclocheilus revealed the combined effects of the level of eye regression, time, and genome ploidy on eye-specific gene pseudogenization. The limited extent of gene decay in all these cavefishes and the very small number of loss-of-function mutations per pseudogene suggest that their eye degeneration may not be very ancient, ranging from early to late Pleistocene. This is in sharp contrast with the identification of several vision genes carrying many loss-of-function mutations in ancient fossorial mammals, further suggesting that blind fishes cannot thrive more than a few million years in cave ecosystems.

Indexed as

Loss of Function MutationAnimalsCavesCircadian ClocksFishesMolesPigmentationPseudogenesSelection, GeneticVision, OcularZebrafishcavefisheseye-specific genesmachine learningmolecular datingpseudogenizationrelaxed selection

Identifiers

PMID32986833
PMCPMC7826195
OpenAlexW3090492791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.