Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986787›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic excision and open operation in children with choledochal cysts: A systematic review and update meta-analysis.

Rui Sun, Na Zhao, Ke Zhao, Zhe Su, Yifan Zhang, Mei Diao, Long Li

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biliary atresia and congenital disorders of the extrahepatic bile ducts.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rui SunDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Na ZhaoChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ke ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ningbo Hangzhou Bay Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Zhe SuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Yifan ZhangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Mei DiaoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Long LiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-3791
Capital Institute of Pediatrics · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe outcomes of children with Choledochal cyst who undergo laparoscopic cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy versus open cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy have not been adequately compared. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain further insight into the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic excision in children with choledochal cysts.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from January 1973 to January 31, 2020 was performed utilizing the PRISMA guidelines. Short-term, long-term and total postoperative complications were the primary endpoint measurements, whereas intraoperative outcomes and other postoperative outcomes were the secondary endpoints.

resultsThe final analysis included 14 retrospective cohorts comprising 1767 patients. There were no significant differences in the patients' short-term postoperative complications (RR = -1.08; 95% CI = -1.72 to -0.67) between the 2 approaches. However, improvements in long-term (RR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.18) and total postoperative complications (RR = -0.29; 95% CI = -0.40 to -0.21), estimated intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, time of initial feeding, and length of hospital stay were observed in patients who underwent laparoscopic excision when compared to those who underwent open surgery.

conclusionsLaparoscopic cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy provides similar or even improved intraoperative, postoperative outcomes when compared to open excision for children with Choledochal cyst.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnastomosis, Roux-en-YBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresChildChild, PreschoolCholedochal CystFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornJejunumLaparoscopyLength of StayLiverMalePostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID32986787
PMCPMC7521726
OpenAlexW3090697942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.