Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986781›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for eCPR in the emergency room in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

L Christian Napp, Carolina Sanchez Martinez, Muharrem Akin, Vera Garcheva, Christian Kühn, Johann Bauersachs, Andreas Schäfer

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L Christian NappKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Carolina Sanchez MartinezKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Muharrem AkinKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0936-8755
Vera GarchevaKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Christian KühnKlinik für Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Johann BauersachsKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Andreas SchäferKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3206-6162
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) refractory to conventional high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be rescued by extracorporeal CPR (eCPR) using veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO). Even when trying to identify eCPR candidates based on criteria assumed to be associated with a favourable neurological outcome, reported survival rates are frequently below 10%.

methodsAll patients undergoing implantation of V-A ECMO for eCPR between January 2018 and December 2019 (N = 40) were analysed (age 53±13 years; 75% male). Patients with refractory OHCA and potentially favourable circumstances (initial shockable rhythm, witnessed arrest, bystander CPR, absence of limiting comorbidities, age <75 years) were transported under mechanical chest compression. Candidates for eCPR should have a pH ≥6.9, arterial lactate ≤15 mmol/L and time-to-ECMO should be ≤60 minutes.

resultsOverall 30-day survival was 12.5%, with 3 of 5 survivors having a favourable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category (CPC) 1 or 2), representing 7.5% of the total eCPR population. No patient selected for eCPR met all pre-defined criteria (median of unfavourable criteria: 3). Importantly, time-to-ECMO most often (39/40) exceeded 60 minutes (mean 102 ±32 min.), and lactate was >15mmol/L in 30 out of 40 patients. Moreover, 22 out of 40 patients had a non-shockable rhythm on the first ECG.

conclusionsDespite our intention to select patients with potentially advantageous circumstances to achieve acceptable eCPR outcomes, the imminent deadly consequence of withholding eCPR obviously prompted individual physicians to perform the procedure also in presumably more unfavourable settings, resulting in similar mortality rates of eCPR as reported before.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedCardiopulmonary ResuscitationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestPatient SelectionProspective StudiesRegistriesSurvival RateTime-to-TreatmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32986781
PMCPMC7521699
OpenAlexW3089683467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.