Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986770›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Intravenous lidocaine as a non-opioid adjunct analgesic for traumatic rib fractures.

Jeff Choi, Kirellos Zamary, Nicolas B Barreto, Lakshika Tennakoon, Kristen M Davis, Amber W Trickey, David A Spain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. The Skin-Brain Axis: From UV and Pigmentation to Behaviour Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Analgesia for rib fractures: a narrative review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia in 90 patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty and Limb Fractures.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeff ChoiDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1639-8781
Kirellos ZamaryDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Nicolas B BarretoStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Lakshika TennakoonDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Kristen M DavisStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Amber W TrickeyStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
David A SpainDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Stanford University · USSt. Joseph Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain management is the pillar of caring for patients with traumatic rib fractures. Intravenous lidocaine (IVL) is a well-established non-opioid analgesic for post-operative pain, yet its efficacy has yet to be investigated in trauma patients. We hypothesized that IVL is associated with decreased inpatient opioid requirements among patients with rib fractures.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated adult patients presenting to our Level 1 trauma center with isolated chest wall injuries. After 1:1 propensity score matching patients who received vs did not receive IVL, we compared the two groups' average daily opioid use, opioid use in the last 24 hours of admission, and pain scores during admissions hours 24-48. We performed multivariable linear regression for these outcomes (with sensitivity analysis for the opioid use outcomes), adjusting for age as a moderating factor and controlling for hospital length of stay and injury severity.

resultsWe identified 534 patients, among whom 226 received IVL. Those who received IVL were older and had more serious injury. Compared to propensity-score matched patients who did not receive IVL, patients who received IVL had similar average daily opioid use and pain scores, but 40% lower opioid use during the last 24 hours of admission (p = 0.002). Multivariable regression-with and without sensitivity analysis-did not show an effect of IVL on any outcomes.

conclusionIVL was crudely associated with decreased opioid requirements in the last 24 hours of admission, the time period associated with opioid use at 90 days post-discharge. However, we did not observe beneficial effects of IVL on multivariable adjusted analyses; we are conducting a randomized control trial to further evaluate IVL's opioid-sparing effects for patients with rib fractures.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdultAftercareAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedMorphinePain ManagementAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidLidocaineMorphine

Identifiers

PMID32986770
PMCPMC7521689
OpenAlexW3089979743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.