Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32986760›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Clinical use and indications for head computed tomography in children presenting with acute medical illness in a low- and middle-income setting.

Pamela Rudo Machingaidze, Heloise Buys, Tracy Kilborn, Rudzani Muloiwa

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pamela Rudo MachingaidzeDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Heloise BuysDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9778-8233
Tracy KilbornRed Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rudzani MuloiwaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputed tomography (CT) imaging is an indispensable tool in the management of acute paediatric neurological illness providing rapid answers that facilitate timely decisions and interventions that may be lifesaving. While clear guidelines exist for use of CT in trauma to maximise individual benefits against the risk of radiation exposure and the cost to the healthcare system, the same is not the case for medical emergency.

aimsThe study primarily aimed to retrospectively describe indications for non-trauma head CT and the findings at a tertiary paediatric hospital.

methodsRecords of children presenting with acute illness to the medical emergency unit of Red Cross War Children's Hospital, Cape Town, over one year (2013) were retrospectively reviewed. Participants were included if they underwent head CT scan within 24 hours of presentation with a non-trauma event. Clinical data and reports of CT findings were extracted.

resultsInclusion criteria were met by 311 patients; 188 (60.5%) were boys. The median age was 39.2 (IQR 12.6-84.0) months. Most common indications for head CT were seizures (n = 169; 54.3%), reduced level of consciousness (n = 140;45.0%), headache (n = 74;23.8%) and suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) malfunction (n = 61;19.7%). In 217 (69.8%) patients CT showed no abnormal findings. In the 94 (30.2%) with abnormal CT results the predominant findings were hydrocephalus (n = 54;57.4%) and cerebral oedema (n = 29;30.9%). Papilloedema was more common in patients with abnormal CT (3/56; 5.4%) compared with none in those with normal CT; P = 0.015; while long tract signs were found in 42/169 (24.9%) and 23/56 (41.1%) of patients with normal and abnormal CT findings, respectively; P = 0.020. Post-CT surgery was required by 47(15.1%) of which 40 (85.1%) needed a ventricular drainage. A larger proportion of patients with VPS (25/62; 40.3%) required surgery compared to patients without VPS (22/249; 8.8%; P<0.001).

conclusionA majority of head CT scans in children with medical emergency with acute neurological illness were normal. Patients with VPS constituted the majority of patients with abnormal CT scans that required subsequent neurosurgical intervention. Evidence-based guidelines are required to guide the best use of head CT in the management of children without head trauma.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHeadHeadacheHospitals, PediatricHumansHydrocephalusIncomeInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeuroimagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32986760
PMCPMC7521723
OpenAlexW3091232279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.